<p>lion passage</p>
<ul>
<li>author wrote passage:</li>
</ul>
<p>Regretable
Educate the public
Bad</p>
<p>I put the 4th answer… whatever it was.</p>
<p>Hm, how did it help the argument? I put it had no effect. It said, manes are affected by climate, so how does it help that argument if there is an extra hormone factor? I think it has no effect on it.</p>
<p>hormone couldn’t have helped it because lines 7-9 said simply that the environment and climate change a lions main (saying thats what causes the changes) however, hormones play a factor too so its not just the environment and climate</p>
<p>Yep, i agree with tfeduardo, but i was not sure if it WEAKENED the argument or had no effect. I ended up putting no effect</p>
<p>The “conclusion” was: “Lions’ manes are affected by climate and elevation.” </p>
<p>The fact that hormones also affect manes weakens the conclusion because the conclusion makes no mention of hormones and makes it seem like those are the only two things that affect makes.</p>
<p>^agreed. so far it looks like i’ve missed 1-2…hopefully no more!</p>
<p>But it said that hormones caused differences in mane length. Wouldn’t that help the author’s argument that manes come in different lenghts? Ahhhh I think I got it wrong now…
There goes my 36 in reading =[</p>
<p>“i seriously think that hormones helped. can anyone find the passage?”
sorry i meant to say “weakened.” tfeduardo is right</p>
<p>@ Jamesford</p>
<p>The thesis of the passage was that lions that the public saw (fully maned lions) was in fact a misconception.</p>
<p>This seems to be supported by the fact that lions in different climates and elevations had different length manes and also supported by the fact that some lions suppress their hormones and do not grow manes.</p>
<p>Does anyone remember the context of “countries’”?</p>
<p>“He was also later in life disgusted/dissapointed”-what were the other choices for this?</p>
<p>was the greedy answer the same one as “developers were interested in profits”?</p>
<p>@cclolzftw</p>
<p>That question from English/not reading.</p>
<p>It was country’s</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Yes, but the question asked “The mention of hormones has what effect on the conclusion in lines 7-9?” It made a specific line reference to a single sentence.</p>
<p>Charlie Brown - i think so, i put developers were interested in profits</p>
<p>i still think it’s hormones have no effect, but not sure, if it weakened it then i have -1 so far</p>
<p>I know, but which sentence was it in?</p>
<p>@jamesford</p>
<p>If that’s the case and I misread the question, it should be ignored. After all, just because hormones also influence the mane length it doesn’t mean that elevation/climate can’t influence it as well.</p>
<p>That’s a logical fallacy.</p>
<p>im reasonably sure it was weakened because the thesis was like elevation is directly porportional to climate, and if there were other factors it would weaken it</p>
<p>Also, anymore mall questions? I found the passage after all, lol.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>I don’t remember the exact wording of the sentence, which affects everything.</p>
<p>In any event, it definitely was not strengthened.</p>
<p>the “aaouutt there” was making fun of his accent right? In the first reading passage?</p>