<p>MiniIm trying to follow your logic here
</p>
<p>Presumably you have nurses and sanitation workers in Olympia, Washington, too, and presumably they earn a lot less than they would in New York City. And presumably some of these families from Olympia qualify for financial aid (though they may well live in houses much nicer than those average $1.2 million dollar two-room rat-infested walk-ups in Manhattan). According to your reasoning, the children of those nurses and sanitation workers in Washington are presumed to be the salt of the earth, whereas those from a part of the country where salaries and housing costs are vastly higher--and whose standard of living may actually be lower--must be spoiled rich kids with maids and fancy cars whose "entitlement" poisons the air of any school that admits too many of them.</p>
<p>And this shouldnt be seen as Bulldog-bashing? :confused:</p>
<p>Mini, youve previously posted about your own experience at Williams back in the Paleozoic Era, [where] coming from a far lower economic bracket than the overwhelming majority of students, I remember the differences in the way many students perceived the world, and their actual experience of it: the kinds of cars they drove (and whether they had cars at all), the clothes they wore, the discretionary income they had on campus, the sports they participated in, where they went for winter and spring break, the kinds of summer jobs they had (and whether they carried an on-campus job at all), how well traveled they were, whether they were fluent in other languages, whether they assumed they could afford expensive professional schools after college
(<a href="http://www.collegeconfidential.com/cgi-bin/discus/show.cgi?70/88070%5B/url%5D">http://www.collegeconfidential.com/cgi-bin/discus/show.cgi?70/88070</a>). You have devoted tremendous time and energy to devising a formulathe Entitlement, or Preppy, Indexthat purportedly proves that certain schools (Williams, of course, and Yale also seems to have offended you in some way) are still bastions of haughty privilege, while your daughters Smith isnt like that at all.</p>
<p>I wouldnt presume to question your experience at Williams or your daughters at Smith. But I also came from a far-from-affluent family (I had campus jobs, summer jobs, and no junkets on winter or spring break; I got my first a cara used junker that cost $400--when I went to grad school, which I could afford only because I received a fellowship), and my experience at Yale wasnt like that at all. Yes, there were some very rich students and some very poor onesbut personally, I never met so many nice Jewish public school kids (like myself) in my life.</p>
<p>Saschayou indicated all along that you were leaning toward Carleton, and that may well be the very best fit for your daughter. There could be any number of reasons to choose that over Yale (including the fact that you went there yourself; my daughter is at Yale now, and theres something wonderful about sharing a common frame of reference)only Id take Minis "objective" arguments about rich, entitled Yalies with a pinch of salt.</p>