<p>How much should we factor into our decision-making the manner or style in which a school recruits? For example, if a school is more assertive in their methods than comparable schools, should we interpret that as signifiying a greater interest in the athlete and/or greater ambition or better work ethic on the part of the coach? For example, one school we visited was very low-key, really didn't try to sell their program, and when the coach called he said he wasn't going to call or write every week like some coaches do, but he was very interested in D. In contrast, the coach of a similar school is very regularly making contact, such as with hand-written notes and snail mailing, phone calls, and personal e-mails, etc.</p>
<p>As a second example, one school uses a coach-recruiter to make all the contacts with D, but this gentleman would not be the person coaching her and the coach himself has not made any overtures. We find this rather depersonalized, but maybe a lot of schools do this too--just not the ones we're mostly dealing with. Should we make any assumptions about this? Maybe that the other coaches aren't very personable and so they don't trust them to recruit?</p>