<p>Lol take AP stats, you will always be ready.</p>
<p>I took AP stats and there wasn’t AP level stats questions on the test.</p>
<p>todays sat us history should just die.</p>
<p>I learned about the box plot from AP stats. Obviously they wont put the actual AP stats material on Math II.</p>
<p>Really? I thought it was fine. Well, it was pretty difficult, but my fail at doing Math 2 fast enough made feel better about US.</p>
<p>lol yeah, but it would be nice b/c I spent more time on stats than pre-calc.</p>
<p>curve generous for math 2 u think?</p>
<p>This is a stupid thread. It all depends on your own perception.</p>
<p>^ Also, CCers as a whole are likely more prepared for standardized tests than the general populace.</p>
<p>US History - Okay/Easy
Math II - Harder than I expected
Literature - Ridiculous, Probably Flunked Big Time, Not Joking</p>
<p>For me: I took practice tests from Princeton Review and from Kaplan for Math II. The highest number of questions I was even able to answer was around 32. So I was worried. But when I took this test - I was able to answer 46 questions. Such a big difference! So for me, the math questions were fairly easy.</p>
<p>US History easier than World History, despite the reverse on APs.
Hebrew wasn’t bad, but I can only imagine that curve…</p>
<p>Math 2 was harder than I expected it to be. I had been scoring 700-730 on Barron’s tests, and finishing them in about 50 minutes; I ended up only answering 43-44/50 on the test today, and will be lucky to scrape together a 700.</p>
<p>Could have been (and probably was) the testing environment.</p>