<p>
[quote]
Why? Well I think it's childish. I don't believe in some being that can take form. I just believe in something that created the universe. That something happens to be God with a capital G. How else to I explain this?
[/quote]
</p>
<p>Have you considered admitting that you aren't smart enough to know that answer, or we may never?</p>
<p>I do think almost everyone here who is religious (and you all seem skeptical at that) was born into it and taught it. Like saying please and thank you. I understand the mental block that ensues because of instilled values. I think this is why that, no matter how sensical those denouncing religion are, religion people are unable to concieve that they may be wrong. That mummy and daddy may have wronged you from birth.</p>
<p>Another thought I have, that probably doesn't concern people here, is that the level of intellect required to concieve nothingness and infinite is higher than the typical person's. I don't know how much people here have been exposed to the truly average man, but you will begin to recognize that not everyone can be a doctor, lawyer, etc. You will see that you simply cannot trust a lot of people to make the logical judgements required for such proffessions. The same concept translates to religion, a lot of people may not be able to make the logical jump from the easy answers to the difficult or lack thereof. As abovesaid, those trying to make logic of it were probably born into it.</p>
<hr>
<p>Scientists take their own work with a grain of salt, and our religious country illustrates a scientists stance as a scientist's stance on a subject. We seem to neglect that a scientist has no stance on a subject, he simply believes what has been proven to him, and admits his ignorance to subjects he has no knowledge of.</p>
<p>I, myself, have always taken an underlying aspect (actually the entire basis) of science with a grain of salt (I think it an excuse for ignorance of causes), and I am beggining to contemplate ways to disprove this widespread assumption. A result of my theorizing would prove predestination and fate. If it is so, then scientists will be rediculed for their old beliefs and told religion was right in this one point. Religion is still wrong, it is a guess and will always be. If it's coincidentally right, then its just that - coincidence.</p>
<p>
[quote]
You do realize that saying I win I win I win while playing a game doesn't actually mean you win right?
[/quote]
The point here he is trying to make is that of obstinancy - "just because you say so, dont make it mean so." The straw man arguments are unconvincing.</p>
<p>
[quote]
Will you marry me cwatson(in a totally non-gay way of course)
[/quote]
We'd have to make that a civil union, as our genetic (I think) differences would make us hellbound and we minion's of the devil cannot have a holy union; marriage.</p>
<p>
[quote]
You do realize that saying I win I win I win while playing a game doesn't actually mean you win right?
[/quote]
Here, unlike most places, people have to substantiate their claims. A difficult task when in favor of the unknown.</p>