<p>I am hard pressed to believe that EVERYONE did that.</p>
<p>Also, I am skeptical about how you would have gotten such information.</p>
<p>I’m sure that many RSi projects are intel and siemens semifinalist worthy. Can a previous rickoid comment on this. </p>
<p>for ISEF, at least, sana raoof won with her project from RSI. I’m sure that she did well in Siemens and intel as well ( though I’m not sure).</p>
<p>Stop trying to take away from RSI dododo. It IS a great experience and we WILL do great research projects! No one is undermining the research that you might do, so stop undermining the research we might do. </p>
<p>God, dododo is really making me a tad angry. it amazes how far into denial people will go in order to validate their self-worth. I don’t think anyone SHOULD measure their self-worth by RSI or anything like that, but it seems like dododo had a little bit too much of his confidence vested in getting into the program. It’s like a woman qwho enters a beauty pageant, loses, and then spends the next weeks “finding out” that all the other girls have had work done, or were wearing too much makeup or something. It’s a little ridiculous. </p>
<p>I’ll show you when I’m a semifinalist next year (hopefully).</p>
<p>You can make up as many facts as you want and stretch as much information as you want, but RSI will always be RSI.</p>
<p>Good job on ssp, tomjonesistheman!! Good to see SOMEONE isn’t being a whiny baby and is taking advantage of other awesome opportunities… See you in boston this summer!</p>
<p>And another thing:
Maybe you didn’t get into RSI because you are the type of person who determines the weight and value of a wonderful research experience based solely on awards. </p>
<p>some people actually LIKE this stuff (<em>gasp</em>) and they do it for that reason, and that reason alone. Whether or not I do well in those competitions will play absolutely no role in how challenging and/or stimulating I view my research.</p>