<p>It is not like harder and easier, PR for Math2 really terrible, irrelevant Q, not-detailed explanations. B is enough for 800.
If you need more tests you can take a look at MC-Graw Hill, they are easier but not a lot.</p>
<p>I’ve heard Dr. John Chung’s Math Level 2 book is phenomenal, and that it’s a lot harder than the real thing, so when you show up on test day it’ll be a cake walk. I didn’t use it though, since I already had Barron’s, which I thought was more than sufficient prep as long as you go through it and really pay attention to every section.</p>
<p>Do you think that getting the Chungs book is essential - PR seems simple enough and so I am wary of getting Mcgraws.</p>
<p>Would you guys suggest that I should get the collegeboard tests too.</p>
<p>I am doing 4 subject tests in chem, phy, math 1, math 2.</p>
<p>With the 2 math papers in January.</p>
<p>Thanks in advance.</p>
<p>Did a practice test in Barrons and got 680 very disappointed, although the paper seemed very difficult in comparison to PR where I got a 780 on it in timed conditions etc.</p>
<p>I dont know about the Chungs book, and as I said only get Mcgraws if you want more tests,
I studied from Barron and I took two test (one was makeup) and I’m pretty sure Barrons covered more that 45 questions
And yes it is harder that real test, I think if you study the book you can manage to get ^750 (on Barron)</p>