<p>TOPIC: Are snap judgments better than carefully planned decisions?</p>
<p>In today’s society, circumspection is generally advertised over impulsive decisions as being the wiser method of identifying solutions to convoluted complications for a myriad of reasons. While in certain circumstances an intuitive judgment made instantly on the spot can prove to be optimal, in the vast majority of situations a calculated response is far better in resolving an issue. As the examples of the actions of Romeo and Juliet within Shakespeare’s play “Romeo and Juliet” indicate, the outcomes that arise out of snap judgments are far inferior to those that occur as a result of planned arrangements.</p>
<p>As one of the main protagonist within the renowned tragedy “Romeo and Juliet”, Romeo is a character that exhibits the downfalls of making rash decisions based on emotions without considering the consequences. After the death of his friend Mercutio at the hands of Tybalt, a Capulet and traditional adversary, Romeo immediately slays Tybalt in a fit of rage, leading to the precipitation of his exile from Verona and eventual demise. Furthermore, Romeo does not learn his lesson and commits another series of foolhardy actions later on in the progression of the play by credulously rushing back to Verona, risking death by violating the terms of his exile, after hearing of the death of his love Juliet from a servant. Arriving at the Capulet crypt and discovering the apparently dead Juliet, Romeo bids farewell to her and drinks a vial of poison hastily obtained from an apothecary, shortly dying by her side. The devastating consequences that were incurred as a corollary of Romeo’s impetuous judgments could have easily been avoided had he hesitated before committing the actions to ponder over the implications and possible consequences of his reasoning. By being more cautious and carefully planning decisions beforehand, positive outcomes such as the survival of the couple and the aversion of catastrophes are easily foreseeable. </p>
<p>In an analogous manner, the female protagonist Juliet makes numerous questionable decisions throughout the play that openly portrays the deficiencies of spontaneous logic. Following the exile of her lover Romeo and the announcement of her marriage to Count Paris, the unwilling bride-to-be Juliet flees to Saint Peter’s Church to seek the wise counsel of Friar Laurence. Even after a plan is devised for her to avoid marriage to Count Paris by pretending to be deceased, Juliet panics during the execution stage of the proposal and takes a sleeping potion ahead of schedule due to the date of her wedding being brought forward. Although she successfully avoids the short term debacle of the marriage of Paris, long term consequences such as Romeo’s suicide and the death of Paris are incurred because of the prompt ruling made by Juliet. This development of events is an epitome of an instance when a momentary verdict provokes future ramifications as a direct impact of its lack of foresight and consideration. If a comprehensive analysis and evaluation of the situation had been conducted, the abundant existence of alternatives that could have saved the lives of Romeo and Paris would have been clearly evident. </p>
<p>As indicated by the decisions made by the characters of Romeo and Juliet and the repercussions that arose as a result, snap judgments often overlook critical aspects of a quagmire and hence culminates in unideal outcomes. It is an unequivocal fact that carefully planned decisions yields superior results in the way that every available evidence are able to be taken into consideration without being omitted. Summarily, carefully planned decisions are better than snap judgments due to greater deliberation and examination of possible actions that are to be undertaken. </p>
<p>An estimation of the score and ways to improve are greatly appreciated. Thank you for your assistance :) </p>