<p>Again, i have to say this time… the curve seems to be -3 raw is 790 and -2 is the lowest 800 for bio M. The curve seems unforgiving…</p>
<p>Usually though, Bio M has the better curve, but i guess this all depends on tests.</p>
<p>And yes i used barrons, and the tests were much harder, i barely got 770 on those.</p>
<p>!! Can anyone post the link for the 2010 MARCH Sat Bio discussion thread?
My classmates and I just got our scores and would really like to check to see how the curve was. I remember looking at it and now cannot find it. </p>
<p>Did it get deleted? I apologize if you’ve seen this post (I posted it to one other place just in case) </p>
<p>Thanks!</p>
<p>Percentiles are out guys…</p>
<p>800 is still only 97th percentile nationally… same as last year. hummmm</p>
<p>there are no subject tests in march</p>
<p>this was the first SATII that my son took. i expected the tues report to list how many ?s he missed but it only gave his percentile score. not very helpful info.</p>
<p>Sat subject tests only gives you a number… same with the APs</p>
<p>I didn’t miss any, seemed pretty confident about my answers, and got a 790 as well. But I don’t think I would have missed more than a question…</p>
<p>and actually it said a 790 was a 98th percentile</p>
<p>what about 10 wrong and 10 omit :S:S</p>
<p>what is the max wrong with 0 omits for a 750.</p>