<p>…so did mine. Obviously I already took one…</p>
<p>But she thinks G’town is Ivy, so you still win.</p>
<p>Lol I figured. My GC is the only male GC. And he’s probably the best one in school (based on what I heard lol).</p>
<p>Do you guys think that it will change drastically? Like a new section or something.</p>
<p>That’s is what the article is suggesting. We could be looking at anything: time changes, sat adding a section, scoring policy changes, etc.</p>
<p>Sent from my LG-VM696 using CC</p>
<p>@Descuff: Yes, I do look forward to any challenge…:)</p>
<p>Descuff, I would just like to point out your usage of “I think” in presenting the argument that the ACT is better. Your opinion is based on your experiences. *I think * that the SAT really wasn’t too bad at all. As another person had pointed out, the SAT is easier for some while the ACT is better for others. Ultimately, the point is to do well on at least one of the tests and get into college, so whichever is better for the individual is what matters.</p>
<p>@chewy except more people find that act is better for them than the sat.</p>
<p>Sent from my LG-VM696 using CC</p>
<p>ACT curve is also a lot nicer than the SAT’s.</p>
<p>Yet in Mississippi schools here (known as some of the best) average College bound students average i think around a 18.</p>
<p>SAT is 40 minutes away.</p>
<p>The SAT is still much more prestigious (at least to the general public). And sometimes it is thought of as an intelligence test, even though it isn’t one.
Stereotypically, a student with an ACT 36 is a hard worker with a 4.0 GPA, while one with an SAT 2400 is a brainy genius/nerd with a very high IQ. Not saying that this is true, though.</p>
<p>I think my position in the ACT/SAT debate is rather obvious</p>
<p>Said the actor…</p>