<p>was the one with that voting chart that immigrant voting had the biggest change before the depression? because the jump to 1928 was bigger than the difference to the 3rd column</p>
<p>and no, esplin: big business/industrialists hatedd FDR</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Supposedly that’s the answer. I put FDR’s first term too, but I didn’t remember when he was elected because I had serious brain freeze =P</p>
<p>My dates all went poof. Pooooooooooooooooooooof</p>
<p>
[quote]
but the question asked “which of the following is NOT true of the graphs”, which would mean imports>exports because that was not true.</p>
<p>btw, i think they were anticommunists…if you read both mccarty and nixon’s wiki pages, it says paraphrased something like “they rose to the national front after their communist red hunts”[/quote[</p>
<p>I don’t remember that. I think everybody I’ve talked to has said which is true? But I’ll check with other people I know.</p>
<hr>
<p>4 more!</p>
<ol>
<li>most English tobacco labor before 1680 was indentured servants</li>
<li>difference between Mass/VA and Spanish colonies: joint stock</li>
<li>local colonial affairs dealt with by: town meetings</li>
<li>Obligation to enforce court rulings: Eisenhower (What were the choices? Was a Nixon one of them choices?)</li>
<li>led to depression: production v. consumption</li>
<li>1880s and 1890s party agreement: no immigration from china</li>
<li>ICC and sherman antitrust: first one is regulatory, second is prohibitory</li>
<li>lost generation: writers who go off to europe who were disillusioned by the 1920s</li>
<li>reason for the second new deal: deepening recession still present, had to fix it, to quell critics (critics said Roosevely wanted to destroy capitalism?)</li>
<li>lowell picture: availability of factory work for men and women</li>
<li>first to be settled by europeans: FL I believe the first was Massachusetts. I know for a fact it was not FL. Maybe you chose FL, because it was the first Capital established in 1556? By the SPANIARDS, not EUROPEANS.</li>
<li>quote about segregated schools being unequal: brown v board</li>
<li>14th point: self-determination</li>
<li>helped french in french and indian war: Iroquois</li>
<li>saratoga: french support</li>
<li>bad farming conditions in quote: 1890s</li>
<li>book not matched with setting: farewell to arms and reconstruction</li>
<li>open door: interest in commerce in china</li>
<li>judicial review: john marshall (don’t think this was one of the options. the only relevant option was madison. it didn’t have marbury or marshall as choices)</li>
<li>jefferson and hamilton: j was strict construction, h was loose construction</li>
<li>nixon, mccarthy, jfk: anticommunists</li>
<li>carters unpopularity: iran hostage crisis</li>
<li>what didnt lbj do in great society: social security</li>
<li>vietnam war in us: caused division in unity on homefront</li>
<li>native american population loss: european disease and lack of resistance</li>
<li>picture of dots in south: good land in southern area for plantation farming Was one of the choices land in the North was not good or something? Which is the same thing as this is implying?</li>
<li>Roosevelt Corollary - intervene in Latin America</li>
<li>Dred Scott case - he is not a citizen and cannot speak for himself in court</li>
<li>JFK Soviet missiles in Cuba - naval embargo of Cuba</li>
<li>Walt Whitman poem questions - Rejecting Reason</li>
<li>What movement does the poem come from. Romanticism</li>
<li>1920s immigration stopped flow of- southern/eastern Europeans</li>
<li>first to have regular maritime voyages- Spain (? vs. Portugal!) First was Portugal I Believe</li>
<li>Era of Good Feelings was hindered by- issue of slavery in new territories</li>
<li>Missouri Compromise - led to Missouri as a slave state</li>
<li>Clay and Warhawks supported War of 1812 - To drive out British/Indians in the West</li>
<li>who did not support FDR in the 1936 election Industrialist</li>
<li>manifest destiny- spread to the Pacific Ocean</li>
<li>desegregation of military- Truman in Korea</li>
<li>Agibail Adams and John Adams letters - Women were interested in being politically equal</li>
<li>Indian Removal of the 1830s- Trail of Tears</li>
<li>19th Amendment- women can vote</li>
<li>Nixon policy of détente</li>
<li>Women -> Shape morals</li>
<li>Book about Cult of Domesticity</li>
<li>Populist Quote</li>
<li>Entertainment 1950s (The Organization man, davy crockett)Honeymooners, etc)</li>
<li>Statehood NW Ordinance</li>
<li>Graph - price of slaves rose sharply while price for cotton remained relatively constant</li>
<li>Isolationism definition - US not interested in European affairs due to the geographic distance (nonentaglement)</li>
<li>Sinclair and the Jungle</li>
<li>WWI Declaration - Mexico? (There is no superior answer…)</li>
<li>Labor during New Deal Gain collective bargaining</li>
<li>McCarthy Quote</li>
<li>Industrialism philosophy - Social Darwinism</li>
<li>Imperialism Least question - Counteracting European forces (4 other options all prioritized US first, which is what imperialism is about)</li>
<li>No Jury in Smuggler Trials Power of Assemblies</li>
<li>in Colonies (Powerful then decreases, King imposes as you get closer to revolutionary war)</li>
<li>Monroe Doctrine</li>
<li>Graph of Imports v. exports Roughly same at start of both wars</li>
<li>Transportation Revolution - Steamboat/canals/railroad option</li>
<li>What did Cady Stanton and Lucretia Mott do, they were in Seneca for Women’s Rights</li>
<li>Spain Didnt need manufacturing Outlet for its goods Darn!!! I think I got this wrong lol.</li>
<li>Mercantilism - More exports than imports</li>
<li>Massachusetts Bay - Dispels Dissenters</li>
<li>Jacob Riis - conditions in NYC</li>
<li>Vaccine in 1950- Polio</li>
<li>Washington Quote - “Farewell Address”</li>
<li>Cattle - Decrease in demand for beef</li>
<li>Which of the following did not happen 3 years into the great depression - Inflation or Increasing investments in capital market or increased production</li>
<li>Gulf of Tonkin v. UN Resolution - Unconcluded, both mandated war, one to Johnson with a blank check the other to the US but for a specific war (But Truman makes the suggestion so…).</li>
<li>Articles of Confederation Land</li>
<li>Washington dc conference 1921-naval arms limitations</li>
<li>malcom x </li>
<li>Immigrant Voting in Chicago</li>
<li>Africans were not growing cotton in Africa</li>
<li>Laissez-Faire</li>
<li>Indentured servants</li>
<li>Antiliberal and Antisecular Fundamentalism</li>
<li>Maryland - Religious Toleration Law-thing.</li>
<li>Gap between rich and poor increases</li>
<li>Columbus Find a western route to Asia</li>
<li>Voting Trends Blacks got help after voting laws.</li>
<li>Assimilation of Indians Quote</li>
<li>McClures Magazine 1920s</li>
<li>Moving from Home to Textiles
87.</li>
</ol>
<p>how is the lowell picture availability of factory work for both men and women
the picture had ONLY women
the typical SAT thing is that the answer has to be STATED in the problem not implied
while we know that men may also have had factory jobs, that is not stated in the cartoon
then again…all of them seemed kinda wrong, but i said seperate spheres
since this was a woman’s only job, so it was a separate sphere for women kinda</p>
<p>also who had the first systematic voyages of exploration
spain or portugal?
i said spain
got the great society one wrong…and maybe the cartoon -.-</p>
<p>yeah, that was a trick question.</p>
<p>but people were already feeling discontent because the republicans did nothing to alleviate the growing problems of the poor.</p>
<p>does hooverville come into mind ? : )</p>
<p>lemonio: the sphere in the right was men.</p>
<p>separate spheres implies women’s sphere is in the home, men is in industry. this had both in industry, so it’s not separate spheres</p>
<p>“The idea of separate spheres was a nineteenth-century doctrine that there are two domains of life: the public and the domestic. Traditionally, the male would be in charge of the public domain (finances, legal matters, etc.) while the female would be in charge of the private domain (running the house, ordering the servants, etc.).”</p>
<p>Lemonio - The commercial/propaganda directly goes against the cult of domesticity, which concerns two questions towards the end of the test.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>What’s this a response to?</p>
<p>your question about the shift in voters to Democrats of course</p>
<p>True, getting land for 100 years into the future is a possible reason for expansionism. However, the question was asking for the weakest reason for acquiring new territories. Overpopulation in the nation was not a good reason, or at least as good of a reason as trying to curb the influence of European powers by extending the power of the United States in order to preserve the integrity of the US. Actually, I have read the Turner Thesis (against my will). It hammers the point that the identity of America rested upon the existence of the frontier, and does not focus upon the nation’s population.</p>
<p>The one problem with the anti-communist answer is that JFK was NEVER known for being anti-communist (he was but not in an unique or special way like McCarthy or Nixon). He gained absolutely no national exposure for that, unlike the other two, who both received it AFTER getting elected. On the other hand, all three STARTED (as in “First got elected”) as war heroes, although McCarthy later turned out to be a fraud. In response to the commment:
“It only seems to beg the question then, why doesn’t every military hero become a politician?”
Actually, for a while, that was the policy of both parties. They tried to find local heroes and national heroes like Joe McCarthy (Tail-gunner Joe), Nixon (Lieutenant Commander) , JFK (TIME magazine Hero, Purple Heart recipient), and Dwight D. Eisenhower (both parties tried to get him to run for them).<br>
P.S. Joe McCarthy actually held the record for most shots fired in the Pacific (he fired at the water when his friends would allow him to take some shots).</p>
<p>lemonio I had the same exact problem. I seriously wasted like 2 minutes staring at the picture cuz the face seemed so obscure.</p>
<p>I just remembered another question - I think. Wasn’t there one that asked about post-WWII policies adopted? And the answer was containment?<br>
(Other choices I think were isolationism, and something else…)</p>
<p>I’m not sure on the exact question.</p>
<p>^The question was basically what was the policy taken towards Eastern Europe after WWII-- containment of course</p>
<p>Lancer, you clearly know a lot more than I do on both subjects.</p>
<p>All I can say is that the curve ought be quite impressive. (Though of course there could be some godly argument for my imperialism choice that I cannot fathom). The Anticommunist thing, unfortunately, is just true and I was in deniable about it all day after having searched wikipedia.</p>
<p>I am just so atrocious at multiple choice D:</p>
<p>However, I have question for you concerning the Tonkin and Korean (UN) resolutions…which one was it?</p>
<p>And also, which did you put for the Mexican war’s inception? I swore that Germany’s return to submarine warfare was NOT an option…</p>
<p>What about the great depression question? Inflation or increased investment in the capital market?</p>
<p>What did you put for the imports/exports graph? I don’t remember, but if it was which of the following is TRUE, then I put that they start off the same at the start of the war.</p>
<p>What about the colonial assemblies? Did they start off powerful then taper off?</p>
<p>And what were Clay and Warhawks supporting?</p>
<p>the person on the right of the cartoon was a guy?
seriously?
omg…****…
how is that possible anyway
guys didn’t work at lowell mills -.-
if it was a guy and that screws up my 800 and i’ll poke out my eyes! =0</p>
<p>But lancer, how is nixon considered to be a major war hero? In that case, both answers are some what flawed but the truth is that whether or not he was a strong anticommunist, kennedy WAS an anticommunist (just look at his foreign policy!) and that seems to make that choice more correct.</p>
<p>ughh i skipped 16 questions…hopefully i will get at least a 700 if the most i miss is 8</p>
<p>What about the colonial assemblies? Did they start off powerful then taper off?
i think the assemblies controlled taxes and in that way controlled the governor</p>
<p>^ the lowell picture had two spheres, one with women working and the other with a man in it.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Isn’t that blatantly untrue later? Sugar Act? Stamp Act? etc.</p>
<p>And most governors were unaffected, because they were rich proprietors of the colony, anyways. If not that, they were probably issued by the King, with his highness’s backing, so later, the assemblies were in constant conflict with the governor.</p>
<p>Perhaps at first all these tactics did work–in fact, at one point, colonies only had assemblies. It’s not until later that governors come along (usually). Eventually the assemblies use such tactics like you mention to temporarily control the governors, but that doesn’t last long, especially because the passage of things like the Intolerable Acts, etc, actually barred certain assemblies from meeting (clearly a destruction of assembly power?)</p>