<p>3880......</p>
<p>3920 (760v 770m 800 800 790)</p>
<p>3640 Is this really as bad as it looks, 'cause it looks bad compared to everyone else's. (770, 720, 750, 720, 680)</p>
<p>3630 (720, 700, 760, 740, 710)</p>
<p>im feelin' the love athlon ;)</p>
<ol>
<li> and I am just fine with my scores.</li>
</ol>
<p>3650, but counting bio-M instead of writing....3800</p>
<p>3840.</p>
<p>(800 780 800 800 660). I think we can all the "problem" in my set.</p>
<p>3540
(760, 650, 760, 730, 640)
The 600's are my SAT I Math and my SAT II Math
i'm cool like that</p>
<p>680M + 740V + 680Chem + 660U.S. + 630Writ</p>
<p>3390...ergh 2nd lowest</p>
<p>Hmm.. pretty interesting: Earlier during this thread, I stated that the mean of all the posters was 3721. After all the additional posts, it is 3727. Funny how its so similar.</p>
<p>Wow, I thought my 3830 was really good. Some of you people are crazy. My friends are ashamed to tell me their scores after they hear mine, you guys must be total outcasts.</p>
<p>720+630+790+740+660= 3540 you think it's UCLA or Berkeley material? probably not.</p>
<p>Actually, I'm applying to UC Berkeley and their method of adding all the scores goes as follows: Best SAT in one sitting + Math SAT II + 2 X Writing SAT II + Third SAT II. Just an interesting way to do it with a greater emphasis on writing.</p>
<p>3740</p>
<p>Guess I'm just about average around here.</p>
<p>3780 (760+760+800+760+700). I used my ACT score, but my SAT score is very similar.</p>
<ol>
<li>Hopefully 3500+ after I take the SAT again.</li>
</ol>
<p>lets make a 3000-upwards club. :)
hehe.</p>
<p>3650( 780,640,760,740,730)</p>
<p>i know just<em>forget</em>me is</p>