<p>i think so…it was subtle evidence or something.</p>
<p>@sat 100, did u get the answers i got?</p>
<p>@Desigirl no I got the other answer, to show a scientific finding. It’s the only one that made sense with how the author of that passage worded that sentence in the passage.</p>
<p>Oh and Ican’t remember the entertaining historical fact. What did the question ask for?</p>
<p>Ones i got wrong:
- Recycling guy, i put celebrity who spends time to visit his fans (cuz i read in the passage at some point he was enjoying his status as a celebrity?)
- STill debating if i got this wrong either self conscious around the land lady or captivated by the land lady’s style
- still debating this question in the blogs short passage? i put intrusion on the experience of reading in a blog, other people say accurate representation?
- i cant remember LOL</p>
<p>Found at 1917, and more thoroughly examined half century later…i thought it was to describe the detail of the biological finding, cuz it talks about the whole details of the biological in that paragraph, though.,…it seems to make a bit more sense.</p>
<p>@SAT100 that was in the traffic passage, quoted a “car was as slow as 40 mph so a guy with a red flag could run past it?”</p>
<p>WHY isn’t the answer the energy guy??</p>
<p>omg…guys add a lot to the list…i feel like we just need 4 more and then we have the whole test!!!</p>
<p>Also, the author of blog passage 2 said that when they find a blog they like, they follow it like crazy, thus I didn’t put that they would agree with the analogy of passing strangers to random readers.</p>
<p>@ARobins i dont think it was the energy guy, its down to celebrity or recycling</p>
<p>@arobins, it was the recycling guy and i hope that intrusion is right for the blog…it made more sense to me…</p>
<p>did u guys for that blog apssage put that both passages talks about a personal view of a contemporary practice or sumting?</p>
<p>yes…and did sat100 get entertaining historical fact, it was about like in the traffic passage…ppl were down between landmark of a traffic law…and entertaining historical fact, but the tone made it seem like entertaining.</p>
<p>I repeat, <em>WHY</em> isn’t it the energy guy? He went to other countries to help people with energy… I was positive at the time.</p>
<p>I remember putting something about “private details” for the blog one.</p>
<p>LOL ARobins! relax best answer was probably the recycling dude, doesnt mean ur answer was bad. and @desigirl, Im almost 100% sure that the answer was entertining historical fact… it was nothing more than mere trivia</p>
<p>omg im getting really scared by the “half century thing” and the entertaining historical fact, can u please think of more to the list…</p>
<p>@desigirl Can’t remember what I got for that anymore.</p>
<p>Yes it was only trivia. However, does anyone remember the energy guy’s situation exactly? I don’t know how the answer wasn’t best, and I really hope I didn’t miss too many more than the photog ones.</p>
<p>was half a century to describe the details of the biological clock ANYONE? i think the energy guy was like really poor or something? or am i making things up?</p>