<p>Also, where are you guys getting the 66 question compiled answers? Gimme a link.</p>
<p>can someone please answer my question</p>
<p>@ lmack I also forgot what that question was, so I’m counting it wrong by default.</p>
<p>i’m at -2 that i’m almost positive of (comprehensive/drudgery and explain an assertion, i chose)
and then still up in the air about philosophy, good accurate description of blog reader, phenomenon vs. theory, and another one that I am still stuck on even though everyone else seems to be resolute (simplification impossible rather than standardization needed. i read the passage again and still think the same thing)
does anyone have what they think the consensus is for accurate descrip. of a blog reader or phenomenon vs. theory?</p>
<p>I think answer is definitely “good accurate description of a blog reader.”
Also up in the air is whether the 4mph traffic law is a landmark historical law or entertaining historical fact.</p>
<p>ENTERTAINING HISTORICAL FACT is the answer…</p>
<p>i’m sure that one is an entertaining historical fact. the word “hastily” kind of throws out landmark law for me</p>
<p>Also, how would “qualify a statement” match with “if legend can be believed?” The way I see it, he is putting up a disclaimer up that his statement is only following the legend, which may or may not be true. That, I believe does the opposite of qualify the statement.</p>
<p>Good. Because I put entertaining historical fact.</p>
<p>*** was the question for the answer “deal (solve) dissatisfaction”</p>
<p>@lmack
I think that question was asking why stryker told gordon parks what he did about photography
but i’m not sure
it was something along those lines</p>
<p>yeah it was the question before the reveal the subtleties about bigots question it was like why did he say “use your camera” and it was to solve his dissatisfaction</p>
<p>@monepo
I think that putting up a disclaimer is actually a good example of qualifying a statement, now that I know what qualifying a statement means. it doesn’t necessarily mean defending it or giving reason for it to be true, but more like putting it in context and making sure that whoever is hearing it takes it for what it is and not something more.
i got that one wrong, i believe.</p>
<p>Again, can anyone gimme the link for the 66 compiled answers for CR?</p>
<p>oh yea and 19 for the traffic one was like discuss the history of traffic control or attempts at controlling traffic</p>
<p>@ ChaCha</p>
<p>I think the guy who mentioned 66 questions just referred to my thread. He probably saw the last question missing, which is Q 19 in the traffic passage, and just subtracted 1 from 67 and got 66.</p>
<p>Can u try to word 19 more specifically? I also got a grasp what ur saying. Ah my memory… lol</p>
<p>I’m thinking that the CR will have an average curve; math, being realistic, will have a harsh curve; and writing, average (there was a diction question, and some of the IDE’s were fairly tricky.</p>
<p>what was the answer to that jman?</p>
<p>Thoughts? of course more specifically on CR considering I posted it in this thread</p>