<p>Is 2C solely based on precalculus? If that is the case, would I score pretty high on a practice test using my "Precalculus: Graphing, Data, and Analysis" by Michael Sullivan and with unlimited time? I would probably spend 3 hrs taking the practice test with an open precalculus textbook the first time. Will I score in the 700+?</p>
<p>geez lil...why don't you try and find out ... lol seriously man</p>
<p>It's precalculus and geometry.</p>
<p>Yeah, basically high school math minus calculus.</p>
<p>Anyone here feel they got their butts kicked with geometric proofs freshman year?</p>
<p>I loved geo proofs. They were mad fun.</p>
<p>Sorry man.</p>
<p>yeah, they were actually interesting, unlike much of algebra II which is plug and chug and boring as hell.</p>
<p>I like calculus a lot though. It's very logicial and interesting, and is really based on mathematical ability, not just memorization.</p>
<p>Sorry for being harsh, but you people are crackheads. Seriously, proofs were so stupid and completely pointless (Not that I was bad at them, just can't stand them being called "interesting")</p>
<p>Proofs aren't useless past highschool. I think you'll find, if you go into high-level math classes, that a lot of them will be proof-based. In my opinion, if you can't prove something, at least informally, you don't really understand it.</p>
<p>It's not that they're "interesting," the process of proving something is what is enjoyable. Using your brain, being creative, figuring something out in a new way, this is fun for some people.
For example, some people find enjoyment in reading poetry, I can't stand it.</p>
<p>It's the same idea.</p>