<p>Hi,
I just completed the quesion of the day today and I found it a little bit ironic that they had such a similar question on the June SAT which I did not use the easy way of doing which was to cancel out so I got it wrong. I just wanted everyone taking the SAT in the fuure to see this question because even though there is a small chance of it coming again, it is always best to know how to do it. Still makes me mad that I missed it on June because I didn't see how easy a question it was.</p>
<p>lol I saw a question just like this in Grubers Math review section.</p>
<p>i spent less than 2 sec on this question to get the right answer. i was even reluctant to hit the "submit"button, because this question is just so retarded T_T</p>
<p>thanks to dude for warning us about the question.but this question is REAL EASY,don't get afraid :P just go on being alert</p>
<p>Cancel 2-2 ;3-3;4-4;5-5;6-6 and the answer is 1/7 .Less than 10 seconds.How can u miss this ?</p>
<p>I don't think I explained what I meant correctly. I got it right when I answered it on the website, but I miseed it on the actual June SAT when you had to cancel all the numbers to 45. I understand how to do the problem, I am just telling all future SAT takers that a problem like this may appear again so just realize the esay way to do it.</p>
<p>thanks for the mnemonic words</p>
<p>This problem on the June SAT was made harder (in a sense) with the same concept. On that test they didn't write it out in that format (which makes it obvious that you can cancel) and instead just wrote that there is a series going from 'first two numbers' to 'last two numbers' or something like that. It was less obvious, or atleast I thought. who knowws.</p>
<p>Oh, and on the june SAT this problem was at the end, definetely atleast a medium, maybe considered it a hard while this QOTD was labelled easy.</p>