<p>I've talked to a lot of people about this, since I'm one of those people with an SAT score that is already great but JUST slightly below the 2300+ threshold. I'm asking myself, does that last stretch of points really matter at ALL? Honestly, the way I see it, at schools like HYPSM SAT scores are essentially just used for cutoff, and really don't bolster (or diminish) your chances beyond that. I think the rest of the stuff on your resume matters tons more. I'm not saying that a good SAT score isn't helpful, only that when you already have a good score, it makes no sense to spend the money and time to try for a 2400 or something. I was considering retaking the SAT but the more I think about it.. </p>
<p>I would say if you're above the 2250 mark, you're fine. In that, from that point on they basically throw everyone into the same category and evaluate your essays, ecs, etc. I really doubt a 2290 is going to reject you over a lesser-qualified 2300 applicant.</p>
<p>Just my $.02, but I think it's probably true for most schools.</p>
<p>I got a 2220, and I have an UW 4.0 and got rejected or waitlisted at the 5 Ivies I applied to + Stanford :( I don't think it helps much since most of the kids applying will have high scores, but having a low one (as the 1800 mentioned) will def. hurt you</p>
<p>anhtimmy: maybe your friend THINKS her application is stainless except for the SAT. Has she contacted the admissions office to find the real reason why? The SAT could be the reason, but you can't be 100% sure.</p>
<p>topspinwu: Not all superscore, but most do.</p>
<p>overture: Agreed. If you're applying to big-name schools, you should try to get as high an SAT score as you can.</p>