Scholarsip chances

<p>LOL …indeed I DID misread and had already written your magnificent lad outta the will. I’m off to my own esquire tomorrow and he gets my used Saturn, which by the time he becomes owner, it’ll be worth more than my grandad’s Edsel, that had I kept, I’d be retired! Oh well …</p>

<p>I AGREE FULLY w/ Esquette according to my dd. She and her roomie went to the polling place …and while they were educated about ramifications of being a minority wearing their Johnny McCain buttons …they all went to lunch and Whit’s with their Brobamified buddies. No harm, no foul. </p>

<p>Which IS very insightful and affirming of what most of us w/ some DU exposure seem to be suggesting …the politics (and passion) are there …but they don’t get in the way of peace, love and harmony. It really is a fascinating dynamic.</p>

<p>But …I understand what grin’s observations might seem to portray. Like Esquette, while there seems to be very little presence here of DU cheerleader/parents, I consider myself a very careful, if not always clear observer of campuses. I’ll not expand or explain that, but …in that vein, I see DU as a real hidden gem, that is hidden in part for the very reason we’re discussing this …there seems to be a disproportionate degree of harmony as a campus community. Furthermore, I think some of this is engendered by a very mature, wise administration. </p>

<p>Now …having said this, are there things I’d change if I had opportunity, resources, smarts? You bet. I’d quickly eliminate “naked” week. It’s mostly a guy thing and many of them would better serve themselves retaining their stylish trousers, from what I’ve been told. Esquette’s gorgeous and studly son would be one of those exceptions …however he’s also so doggone smart, handsome and self-confident, he has no need to drop trousers in order to gain attention. No need there, believe me.</p>

<p>I’d eliminate whatever “queer studies” is. At the same time, it may be one of those things that’s somehow oddly “cool” or enlightened having on the books, I’ve not met any majors there yet. Nor any who felt compelled to be a star on “coming out” week. So, you surely grasp the idea I’m a non-PC, red-necked curmudgeonly dad …who doesn’t wish my daughter dating any among the above noted contituents. Still, it’s fine that she does have some pals who see the world from a vastly different perspective. </p>

<p>And that’s one of the real beauties of DU imo. Students of all shades, colors and creeds from literally every state and a whole bunch of places around the globe. But …that doesn’t translate into mass weird. It seems to be balanced.</p>

<p>btw, I wish they would take all their athletic endeavors in the same vein as lacrosse, swimming, tennis, women’s hoops, etc. They’ve some world class programs …and some world class flops, too. Like so many places, they seem willing to sustain athletic mediocrity when it is clearly evident that mediocrity is the best to be expected.</p>

<p>I LOVE the campus, the community, and the overall mix. I love the fact that they aggressively and unpopularly are working to change the past reputation of a party-hardy place …and replace it with a real community (requiring living there) of bright kids from all over who have enormous potential for being and doing good …and can spend 4 years together working hard, playing hard, growing up to be their best. I’m not sure that is 100% pervasive …or even close…but I am very impressed that it seems that the powers that be are using the substantial resources of the University to address these and more. It’s not a status-quo place, for sure.</p>

<p>WP, your generosity renders me speechless…almost ;)</p>

<p>Again, I second WP’s “on the money” assessments. </p>

<p>Didn’t hear anything about Naked Week from my son, so I’m just going to assume he was at most a spectator … As for his “PC studies” gen-ed requirement, he’s going to fulfill that with a class he’s taking in his study abroad program next fall – now that ought to be eye-opening!</p>

<p>Once again, it seems, I’ll come at this from the “other side”. We live in a tiny very conservative town in a very red state. My husband and I were not born there but we’ve been there now for 25 years, so our kids are native, though 1st gen. We are all registered Dems and proud. We are also adding religious diversity to the community. The boys were both debaters and often took flack for holding their opinions though I don’t think they ever lost any real friends over it. In many ways, being in the minority has made them stronger and made them really consider their own viewpoints.Don’t get me wrong, in many ways it’s been a great place to raise our kids but, one of the things my sons both looked for in a college was a place where diversity of opinions was accepted, nay even welcomed. Even though they wanted to be in places where liberal opinions were valued, neither one wanted a place where the left was so strong that it started becoming as oppressive as the far right. #1 son looked at Reed in OR and it was just such a place to that end as Wheaton, or Hillsdale are on the right. He’s at Carleton. It’s mostly liberal but students respect those who have differing views. IMO, part of college is learning to live with people who are different than you are. It makes you look at your opinions and values in new light. Often that does serve to strengthen them. I just asked #2 son, who is home on break :slight_smile: if he felt that DU had that kind of vibe…he told me he doesn’t think he’d be there if it didn’t.</p>