<p>Yeah haha. You aren’t a stupid little freshman.
But i mean, two days and it went up two points, so i wonder what i can get after a month… let’s hope for a perfect score. :D</p>
<p>The ACT increase is not a linear progression. It is logarithmic. ;)</p>
<p>well lets just hope it goes up more, a lot more.</p>
<p>You’ll definitely find the 34-36 annoying like everyone does.</p>
<p>Most people don’t find it annoying. Most people never get above a 21.</p>
<p>Wow.</p>
<p>You must really love the ACT.</p>
<p>Me? I love the test. </p>
<p>And do you really think I can get a 34-36? That seems really high to me…</p>
<p>I was talking about the 34-36 English rise, and how annoying it is.</p>
<p>And I was talking about cjgone’s mad love for the ACT. :P</p>
<p>Actually, I hate standarized testing and I wish there was some sort of establishment of equality, such as an equal playing field for everyone. But the ACT imo, is the best standarized test to come around and actually gain popularity. The reign of the poorly made SAT is reaching its end. People will be able to succeed on their academic merit instead on how well they can complete pointless, tedious tasks.</p>
<p>^ The only problem to that happening is the fact that you have to admit that the most of the people who can score 2300+ consistently on the SAT would get a 36 instead. ACT scores would be even more inflated than they are now.</p>
<p>^If someone can score a 36 and not equivalent to a 2400 on the SAT, it just means the SAT is a poor test that isn’t demonstrating his or her abilities.</p>
<p>or maybe the ACT is too easy…</p>
<p>But do you guys think I can get that high?</p>
<p>We were being irrelevant to this thread, sorry.</p>
<p>It’s fine.</p>
<p>However, I must say that you shouldn’t limit yourself. Really, anyone can get a 36 if they work hard.</p>
<p>That’s the most ignorant thing i’ve ever heard. ^ Not anyone can get a 36. You still have to be a genius to get above a 33.</p>
<p>The only people in my school I know with above a 30 are mostly really smart hardworking people. But I know a lot of people with 2000+ that are kind of “slow”.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>No? Look at the percentiles.</p>
<p>“You still have to be a genius to get above a 33.”</p>
<p>Not true at all. Unless you believe that IQ tests aren’t capable of measuring intelligence, you are wrong. There are people who can get a 33 on the ACT (I know one person in particular) who cannot even break 120 on an IQ test (far from the 130-140 something you need to be a genius).</p>
<p>Also, if all American test takers of the SAT started taking the ACT, the ACT would look as easy as it is even through the percentiles.</p>
<p>^ I know people with lower SAT scores than ACT scores, so you’re just making things up now. Stop reading those ignorant people’s post on the SAT forum. Don’t be a tool. :)</p>
<p>Think for yourself, there’s no statistical fact that shows the ACT being easier than the SAT beyond preference.</p>
<p>I dunno, it just seems that the SAT seems harder to ace than the ACT for pretty much everybody. I mean, you can’t deny that it requires more work.</p>