<p>@ tkpasq, thanks for your perspective. This year, I applied to UCLA, SD, SB, & SDSU. I got into all of them (stats at a glance: Marine Corps veteran, 3.9 GPA, prerequisites completed everywhere BUT SDSU…missing two). Since I own a house, UCSD & SDSU are my only options. Otherwise, I probably would have gone to Wisconsin (Go Badgers!! Hah!) or Drake. </p>
<p>I’m fortunate enough to know quite a few people in the Actuarial field, and they all say that the number of exams completed is the great equalizer. With that, would it not make sense to go into a program that prepares one for these exams? If you get a chance, I’d like to hear your Brother-in-Law’s opinion on that.</p>
<p>Honestly, I still sway towards SDSU, but with reluctance. It’s hard to turn away a paid-for education from a school like UCSD. It was even harder when an advising rep called me the other day, asking me to give UCSD additional consideration. I was shocked as to why they would even care, considering the applicant pool. Perhaps it had something to do with pulling more federal $ into the school from veterans attending. At any rate, it was flattering.</p>
<p>I got such a good vibe from SDSU, epecially from the veteran side of the house. Per the “Vet Success Program” recently implemented, internships are readily available. As a matter of fact, I have been offered (2) for this Summer, though not related to anything Actuarial. A VA rep is also permanent staff at the school. That’s not something that UCSD is offering at this time, and it makes a huge influence to my decision. </p>
<p>@ CollegiateDreams, thanks for your input as well. I have heard points as to “don’t major in Actuarial Science,” and some of them do make sense. For instance, some feel that a person who can complete exams outside of a specific program is arguably more driven. With that, SDSU’s program is technically a Statistics major, with an “emphasis in Act. Sci.”</p>