<p>Oooh, I love MUN :D. I've gone to Harvard MUN for 2 years now, so let me see if I can give you some advice regarding committees.</p>
<p>The right committee for you really depends on what type of person you are. If you can get up and command the attention of a room with your public speaking, or if you're great at making caucus blocks and just plain old "schmoozing", then go for a GA, ECOSOC, or WHO. WHO is probably one of the harder of these, so take that into consideration.</p>
<p>If, on the other hand, you prefer more personal debate that is often more based on strict adherence to policy and the like, go for OAS or a historical. (By the way, I've never heard of a historical with 150 delegates. Max I've heard of is about 30.) Chances are, these committees will be significantly more difficult in terms of the minute details of debate and policy, with more experienced debaters in them.</p>
<p>You asked if you should go with OAS "because it has the smallest number of delegates." However, I don't fully understand that as your reason for choosing OAS. If you're looking for an award (which isn't the goal, imo), its often easier to get one in a large committee than something small like OAS or a historical. The debaters in the small committees are often tip-top, while the bigger committees will be filled with about half the room doing absolutely nothing. If you're saying OAS because you think it might be more fun, however, you're probably right (imo, some people I know LOVE big committees). The debate in there and a historical will likely be intense for the entire time, while larger committees tend to "hang" a little more.</p>
<p>Wow, that was a lot of info. Not sure how much of that you already knew, so sorry if I was a bore. Either way, hope you enjoy your time at HMUN next year, and you'll probably enjoy any committee you choose.</p>
<p>P.S. I'm pretty sure I'm in the G-8 summit next year at HMUN</p>