<p>Hello Everyone! This is my first post.</p>
<p>I took the SAT and got a 780M/790W/740R and 3 SAT2s 780BioM/800WorldHistory/800Math2. </p>
<p>Would it benefit me take the Chemistry SAT 2 or take the SAT 1 again?</p>
<p>Well, you could get an 800 on Math and Writing, I'm not sure about reading.</p>
<p>Hell, what do you want me to say?</p>
<p>You'll fit right into CC</p>
<p>Weird, my post landed on top of yours. There was some kind of an error posting. This is just too cool.</p>
<p>Haha, I've seen this kind of an error before. Actually, I could probably pull off an 800 in reading easier than the other 2. Honestly, my reading score was a lot lower than it could have been and math was significantly higher so it kind of balanced out. Writing would drop unless I'd review grammar rules hardcore.</p>
<p>Uh, go ahead redoing that 2300+ (as if it will make a difference)</p>
<p>Who knows? Check if the colleges you're aiming for superscore SAT scores.</p>
<p>So is this an honest question or are you asking to inflate your ego? I mean seriously..</p>
<p>Retaking any SAT score above 2300 seems like a waste of $43 and four hours.</p>
<p>No, no I was serious. I've only taken 1 AP (world history) and I was thinking that taking more SAT 2s might be needed to offset that. I haven't taken many b/c my school offers courses at a university.</p>
<p>And also, I was somewhat concerned about competition within my own school b/c a few kids have very high scores and I wasn't sure if it would be worth retaking.</p>
<p>Thank you for the analysis.</p>
<p>The difference between a 2310 and a 2400 (which is somewhat unlikely because 1 slip up would likely bring you down) isn't large enough to warrant taking the test again. 2310 will give you a great shot anywhere. It's even moreso for an SAT 2 where you got a 780. Don't bother taking it again, your scores here will only help you.</p>