Should I take Sat II World HIstory?

<p>I'm taking SAT II Math IIc on June 7th this year.
I took the AP World test and I'm fairly sure I got a 5. I just took a practice Sat II World History test from the official book and got a 800 (but was only two questions from a 790).
The tests I could probably score well on are: Math 2 (guarantee a 800), World History (780-800), US History (taking class next year, probably 750-800), Chemistry (taking AP Chem next year and plan on prepping for USNCO, so 780-800), Literature (taking AP Lit, but English is a little weak for me, so 700-750) and Latin (which I happen to be decent at, maybe a 750).
So should I take SAT II World History? </p>

<p>If you do not like getting good scores DON’T take the test…</p>

<p>If you think you will get a good score why wouldn’t you…?</p>

<p>Sure, go for it. I’m not sure what the point is in taking 6 SAT II’s, though.</p>

<p>^Well I wasn’t going to take 6 SAT II’s; I was just listing the ones that I thought I could do decent on. There’s no way, for example, that I would take the Biology ones, as I would probably get in the <500 range.</p>

<p>Since I’m going to be there anyway, I think I’ll just take it.</p>

<p>see if you can take World History and either Lit or Latin (as those two don’t require any prep if you’re reasonably good at it - languages are tested at CEF A2 level so if you’re in level 4 or AP, it should be a piece of cake.)</p>

<p>As long as you know all the material you’ll do well. If you need lots of review, I wouldn’t. It’s just a lot of information. </p>

<p>Edit: Double post</p>

<p>I REALLY don’t want to go out the way to study more than what I have already done for AP World (which was extensive, since I self-studied).
The official practice test had a lot of obscure questions, which scares me a little. Almost all the ones I got wrong were about things I had like no idea about (unlike on AP tests, where a lot of what I get wrong is due to my failure to analyze/comprehend the question/answers correctly; i.e. the questions on AP tests are more analytic).</p>

<p>^^I’m probably going to take the latin test after junior year. </p>

<p>Yeah. I tried out WH first, but I only did Modern WH, so we covered absolutely nothing before 500 BC.</p>

<p>If you don’t have any idea on some questions, depending on how many exactly, it’s probably not a good idea to take it. Although if you feel as if you didn’t do well, you can ask your proctor to rip up your test before they can send it.</p>

<p>^Problem with that is they’ll cancel my Math ii score then, which I’m sure I’m getting a 800 on. </p>

<p>Aren’t they on separate scantrons?</p>

<p>My Math teacher told me to tell the proctors to shred the bubble sheet if I feel like I did badly.</p>

<p>I don’t really know…</p>

<p>Hmm, I wouldn’t take that risk, especially if you’re taking multiple others.</p>

<p>I’ll ask the proctor beforehand. It’s not like I’ll have lost time studying, since, well, I won’t be studying…</p>

<p>In that case, sure, go for it. And good luck!</p>

<p>Thanks! </p>