<p>First of all, I am definitely not making my decision based on prestige (I'm turning down schools ranked higher than both of these). However, after having an good visit at UNC that shook how sure I was about choosing Michigan, my mom has started mentioning often that Michigan is perceived as more rigorous and prestigious. I know that Michigan is slightly higher ranked and is very rigorous, but in the real world (I'm talking job market) would anyone, other than a Michigan alum, really weigh a Michigan degree as significantly better? </p>
<p>p.s. I am interested in studying political science and economics.</p>
<p>Both are well respected. Just as many Southern employers might feel more impressed to see a Chapel Hill degree. Go where you feel the most comfortable, where you would be more willing to have a core of your life long friends, and where your academic interests are most met. Both are strong emough schools that any perceived prestige differences are mostly just that and you will have an equally respectable resume having attended either. </p>
<p>I will editorialize that UNC and NC schools in general especially like their in state students and out of staters can feel like visitors.</p>
<p>DC2UM2014, just because some schools are ranked higher than others does not make them more “prestigious” The rankings are flawed, and most educated people do not pay much attention to them.</p>
<p>Michigan and UNC are both very well regarded. If you prefer one school over the other, go for it. As dowzerw points out, over 80% of UNC students are in-state students while only 400 undergrads are international. At Michigan, fewer than 60% are in-state students and close to 1,900 undergrads are international. On the other hand, UNC costs $8k/year less than Michigan for OOS students. </p>
<p>… except for engineering, architecture, and other professional programs.</p>