SMART Scholarship ?

<p>Hey I curious about what your “stats” are. I am going to apply for the SMART scholarship. I am full time during my last semester under my associate degree at a local college at the moment. I have a current GPA of 3.6 but after this semester (6 classes/16 credits) I should have 3.8+</p>

<p>Now, I have absolutely ZERO school involvement/awards/sports/clubs/etc. Nor do I have any research experience. BUT, I emailed the SMART team and they said that as long as I meet the basic eligibility requirements, I should apply.</p>

<p>So, what are your stats (grades/research experience etc.)?</p>

<p>I am a sophomore at Wright State pursuing a BS in Computer Science. I don’t have any research experience due to my full class and work schedule. I was an alternate last year and am applying again this year. I really don’t think a lack of research experience will hurt much, as long as you show interest in pursuing research and working for the DoD. Hopefully this year will end in a different result for me!</p>

<p>I am the same way awgreenarrow08 I am so busy with my schedule and have limited time for any extra research projects, but I applied last year and was greatly encouraged to apply again this year, so I’ll do it. GOOD LUCK !!</p>

<p>I’m in the same exact situation as mcrawfo and awgreen - I’m a sophomore that’s studying Animal Science and I applied last year without having much research experience due to lack of time, got chosen as an alternate, and now I’m reapplying. Good luck to everyone who’s applying this year!</p>

<p>So is this not allowed for BME majors? It’s not on the list in the brochure…</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>If you’re pre-med, then no. If you’re interested in BME research, then yes.</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>Average GPA for 2009 was 3.73. There’s some discussion on raising the minimum required to 3.5. Research experience is a definite plus, however, they’re also looking for leadership ability.</p>

<p>If you meet the minimum requirements, you are then assignment a point score. For 2009, I believe that the top half were then passed on to the services. I’d imagine that it will be less this year though, given the number of expected applicants.</p>

<p>Hey everyone,</p>

<p>I’ve started a forum where I can post my experiences and answer all of your questions. I should be able to respond to you much more quickly if you post there.</p>

<p>[The</a> Unofficial SMART Scholarship Forum](<a href=“http://www.thesmartforum.org%5DThe”>http://www.thesmartforum.org)</p>

<p>Chris</p>

<p>I’ve also applied to the SMART scholarship this year. I’m a sophomore at Tufts University School of Engineering, majoring in Engineering Science (tuft’s name for planning your own engineering major, so mine is computer science/biomedical engineering) and second major in Biotechnology. I’ve been doing research since last summer and have a commitment to do it until I graduate and write my senior honor’s thesis, so I hope this research experience will help me… Especially because currently my GPA is only a 3.2. It should be higher after this semester… I hope. </p>

<p>I read somewhere that last year there was ~12% acceptance rate, out of 1800 people. I also read that they are intending on accepting around 300 applicants this year. Not very many but I really really hope I’m one of them!! I’ll keep looking back to the forum to see if people hear from SMART at all. </p>

<p>Oh, and someone asked if you can apply if you’re intending on being a doctor/going to med school and the answer is you can apply but you probably won’t get it. The intention is for SMART to recruit civilian research scientists who will stay for their career doing research for the government.</p>

<p>good luck to everyone and I’ll post if I hear anything back!!</p>

<p>I was an another Alternate from Last Year!
Hopefully this year we all have better luck! </p>

<p>@kbergi01: where did you read the “300” statistic?</p>

<p>Also, to the person who wants to become a Doctor. If you do decline employment with the DoD, you will have to pay almost everything back. </p>

<p>read: <a href=“https://smart.asee.org/assets/File/SMART_2008_Service_Agreement.pdf[/url]”>https://smart.asee.org/assets/File/SMART_2008_Service_Agreement.pdf&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

<p>@wowser</p>

<p>[The</a> Unofficial SMART Scholarship Forum • Index page](<a href=“http://www.thesmartforum.org/]The”>http://www.thesmartforum.org/)</p>

<p>saw it there, sounds about right though, seeing as looking at past data on the SMART website, they have been increasing the amount of applicants every year and the entire purpose of the program was to recruit new research scientists because “in 2010 50% of the current scientists would be eligible for retirement”</p>

<p>I’m hoping they freak out this year that everyone is going to retire and accept more people :P</p>

<p>Thank you Kbergi01! </p>

<p>(and much thanks to the creator/poster of that forum)</p>

<p>

</p>

<p>You’re welcome</p>

<p>BTW everyone, I know a lot of you submitted questions but they didn’t show up in the forum. I’ve fixed the moderator cue, so now everything is showing up, and I have responded to all of your questions.</p>

<p>hey guys i completed the application for the scholarship, does anyone know exactly how the process for choosing awardees goes?</p>

<p>OK folks, here we go. I work for the SMART Program and will try to answer SOME of your questions. I will check back from time to time to read the posts but will NOT respond to everything posted. If you are an applicant with questions, you should contact ASEE directly.</p>

<p>1) Yes, a new process for collecting security clearance related information has been recently added (e.g. the SMART Program Office received direction to modify the process the first week in December 2009 thus why there was no mention of it earlier on our website). Yes, everyone that submitted an application this year is required to complete the entire SF86. For the record, we recognize the substantial work involved for both applicants and our office. We are human and, trust me, have no deep burning desire to increase our workload anymore than applicants have a desire to fill out this form. Having a completed SF86 now enables us to begin processing clearances for new awardees immediately upon award rather than having to wait several additional weeks to begin the process. A few weeks on the front end makes an enormous difference for us and new awardees down the road.</p>

<p>2) We received over 3,400 applications this year; we anticipate making 250-300 awards. Please DON’T take this to mean your chances are low and you should give up now. SMART is a workforce development program with a scholarship component. We strive to select applicants that are both academically strong AND are a good fit for the workforce of the Department of Defense (DoD). Each year some academically well qualified students don’t receive awards because their career interests do not align with the needs of the DoD and/or they are unable and/or unwilling to comply with the terms of the service agreement (please see our website for copies of past service agreements). EVERY completed application will be reviewed and considered with the above in mind. Your chances are as good as the next person so don’t take yourself out of the running by not submitting follow-up information when requested. We have to somehow get from 3,400 down to 250-300 and the first to go are applicants that haven’t submitted information we need.</p>

<p>3) A very general description of our application review and selection process;</p>

<p>a) All completed applications are screened to determine if the applicant meets all of our base eligibility requirements (e.g. applicant has a 3.0 on a 4.0 scale, is a U.S. citizen, 18 years of age or older, etc. – see our website for a complete description).</p>

<p>b) All completed applications meeting our base eligibility requirements are reviewed by a panel of subject matter experts. This year’s panel will consist of approximately 180 people; 50% will be professors from civilian universities across the country, the other 50% will be government employees with expertise in one or more of the STEM disciplines listed on our website. Each application is reviewed by three reviewers; 1 civilian professor, 1 government employee. The final reviewer can be either a civilian professor or government employee.</p>

<p>c) Applicants are ranked by discipline and degree type (e.g. BS, MS, Ph.D). Applicants ranking in the top 50% of their category are considered semi-finalists and are forwarded for further review.</p>

<p>d) Semi-finalist applications are made available to people at the DoD facilities where awardees ultimately end up working after graduation. Groups of people at these facilities review applications of individuals with backgrounds and interests that are aligned with their projected workforce needs. Most facilities conduct phone interviews with these individuals. From this group, each facility submits a list of candidates they recommend for award and placement with their organization. </p>

<p>e) The SMART Program Office (SPO) complies these lists, resolves issues that arise when the same candidate is recommended for placement at multiple facilities, and conducts further screening to insure recommended candidates a) understand the nature of the post-graduation service commitment and b) are willing and able to comply with the terms of the service agreement.</p>

<p>f) Based on the results of these screening efforts and the available budget, a sub-set of these applicants are chosen for an award.</p>

<p>We have been students and most of us are parents too. We truly understand how concerning financial aid and scholarship funding is to each and every individual and care deeply about our applicants and awardees. I hope you find this information helpful and sincerely thank you for your interest in the Program.</p>

<p>Regarding the 3400 applicants…Always reassuring in times of economic crisis, of course, are the overwhelming amount of others who apply alongside you. The email that they extended the deadline to December 31st gave a slight hint that it would be popular this year. I didn’t realize how popular.</p>

<p>Maybe you can answer this or maybe you cannot. Activity on this thread has certainly ceased, so I am not sure if others attend to it still. Are graduate students lumped along with other graduates, or is the pool among everyone? To clarify, do they break it down to evenly disperse awards among graduate and undergraduate students, or is it 250-300 TOTAL, without specific ratio or concern?</p>

<p>Also, about how long does the whittling down process take, and are you notified either which way?</p>

<p>Thank you again.</p>

<p>Jc1982,</p>

<p>Regarding activity on this thread, I don’t know if people are reading it or not. There is another site
[The</a> Unofficial SMART Scholarship Forum • Index page](<a href=“http://www.thesmartforum.org/]The”>http://www.thesmartforum.org/) hosted by one of our past awardees that seems to be getting a decent amount of traffic.</p>

<p>We review all applicants simultaneously although some of the review criteria differs for graduate and undergraduate applicants. The top 50% of students in each category (e.g discipline and degree type) are sent for review by the facilities that employ our students after graduation. Each facility decides for itself what mix of future employees it needs. Some need more with graduate degrees, some prefer those with undergraduate degrees only. The ratio of undergraduates to graduates changes each year depending on the needs of the facilities.</p>

<p>We issue our first round of awards on or about March 31 each year; a second round, if needed, is issued approximately 3 weeks after that.</p>

<p>Thank you for your interest in the Program.</p>

<p>Do Facility Preferences Hinder one’s chances? When it says choosing a preference does not decrease or increase your chances, is that true? I have seen where others say that ONLY facilities you list will see your application. If that’s the case, should I go in and edit my preferences to allow ALL facilities?</p>

<p>Geographic placement is determined solely based on the needs of the DoD and the SMART Program. However, </p>

<p>1) each year some applicants are recommended for placement at multiple locations. For this group, we consider their placement preferences when making the final decision about where to put them and,</p>

<p>2) some, not all, facilities want to make sure they at least look at applicants noting a
specific interest in their facility, particularly if a site is in a location where it is typically difficult to attract new employees (please don’t ask me for a list – it’s a moving target that we simply have not had the resources to fully investigate yet).</p>

<p>3) A very rare few organizations, like the Army Corps of Engineers, have dozens of sites across the U.S. These organizations have much more flexibility in matching people to a specific geographic region so they tend to look more closely at the applicants preference. </p>

<p>Bottom line, we give awards to as many of the most qualified applicants that,
a) we are very confident about we can find jobs for
b) have the budget to support and,
c) demonstrate a willingness and ability to comply with the terms and conditions of the Service Agreement, including the geographic mobility clause.</p>

<p>There is no need to change your facility preferences. The application is locked and we have already prepared the materials for review by our evaluation panel.</p>

<p>Smart Guide,</p>

<p>Is there any way to confirm is transcripts for fall have been received? I ordered mine January 7th but I have not been notified or gotten any sort of confirmation. I am a bit concerned. Should I reorder? When I try ringing 202 331 3544 no one answers and it goes straight to voice mail. Any suggestions on how to proceed here? Thank you.</p>