<p>Monydad,
I can't recall what field your D is looking into. I think it is theater but am not quite sure. I have a D who goes to NYU/Tisch for musical theater. Actually, I have two D's in college. I don't recall looking at ANY of the data that you are looking into though commend you for the very thorough search of each school on your child's list. My kids looked at their personal list of college criteria...the usual things...size, location, curriculum in their area of interest, and in the case of my BFA kid, specifics about the program, etc. My kids picked schools that met their criteria, visited, decided if they liked them, applied, and chose which school they liked best out of all their acceptances. I don't recall delving into these areas that you speak about. Their happiness quotient definitely doesn't seem to hinge on the data you presented. My kids absolutely love their programs, colleges, and the experiences they are having. They are learning a lot, have met great kids, enjoy their professors, are engaged in meaningful activities outside the classroom and are getting an excellent education and preparation for their areas of interest as well. I'm not sure there is much more to it. </p>
<p>If I understand the analysis you are getting out in the first example, you are talking of the enrollment at Tisch being lower for upperclassmen than for freshmen? I hope I understand the question correctly. If so, and I don't have any data or first hand information, but my feeling is that for those who are pursuing BFA in theater programs, there are usually a small number who opt to switch out of these programs, often after freshmen year. I have seen this phenomenon at many BFA in MT schools/programs...I have heard of students who have done this at Tisch, CCM, CMU, BOCO, Emerson, Syracuse, to name a few. A BFA program is very intense and not for all people. Some who enter this kind of program have a strong interest in the field but haven't really ever engagd in such an intensive immersion and the lifestyle that goes with it. There are a few kids who realize that this is not the kind of college program they want to do. It is very specialized for one thing. The hours are very long. The work can be intense. Until some kids actually DO a program like this, they don't come to this realization. So, I imagine a few switch into liberal arts programs. There are some who decide to just join the audition circuit, or who have even been cast in professional theater and leave. There are various reasons but I think a small minority do make a change. Also, at all colleges, even in liberal arts, there are kids who make a change after freshman year. My D has a friend who is at an Ivy who is transfering to Tisch Drama in the fall who just wasn't happy at her school and the location and various other things. It is not an unusual thing for some freshman. For a BFA student, there is a commitment, however, to a specialized major before the student even enters college. A common major for liberal arts college freshmen is "undecided". Many 18 year olds are not ready to commit to one field until they have explored further. So, it doesn't strike me as odd that for those who commit to Drama or MT and to intensive training programs, that SOME might change their mind once they get deeply immersed. Some may not feel that it is for them. Some may not manage the VERY long hours that such a program entails. So, since some freshmen in ANY college or any major (including "undecided majors") may change their minds, and then you have BFA majors who are in commited majors from the get go that are intensive programs, it is not so mind boggling to think that there will be handful who switch out of these degree programs. </p>
<p>As far as the potential dates (young men)....NYU is a HUGE university. If your D can't find boys to date there, I don't know where she would. While within the theater field, there is a higher proportion of gay men than in the general population, there are also straight men. Tisch drama students take classes with Tischies but they also take liberal arts classes with students from all areas of NYU. They live in dorms with all kinds of students. They live in a major city with all kinds of guys. Frankly, I think there are more potential dates at NYU than at an all girls' college....I have a D who applied and got into Smith and while she loved the school for many reasons, decided in the end to not attend as she truly prefered coed as to be around boys in classes, ECs, and socially more than would be at a women's college. </p>
<p>Also if you have a D who is considering a BFA in theater, the issue of gay males in theater classes is going to be the same at Tisch as at any other BFA in theater program she attends, and for that matter, in her career in the performing arts. So, it isn't a Tisch issue but if this IS an issue for your D (and not you), then it comes down to if she wants to do a BFA or BA program as the types of kids that each program attracts, differs in various ways (and not just in sexual orientation). If your D is considering Barnard, a fine college, that implies to me a big difference with Tisch because then it comes down to WHICH type of degree program she wants....a BA or a BFA. That would be a much bigger issue than the boy issue. But as far as young men, there are thousands of straight men at NYU, let alone in NYC. There are many straight guys right in Tisch, including in the drama studios. Besides potential straight male dates, I know my D has numerous close guy friends who are gay and so college is about more than guy dates but also guy friends. In any case, she knows and likes and is friends with males of both persuasions. The guy factor was a non issue when she applied to and chose to attend NYU. For my kids, the guy issue ONLY came up in reference to coed schools vs. all women's colleges. </p>
<p>My daughters picked their colleges for reasons that had nothing to do with any of the "concerns" you brought up. Then again, each person's college criteria differs from the next person. One of my kids wanted her college to have a ski team. Who am I to knock the college criteria someone else uses? It is quite individual as demonstrated here. However, I would urge any parent to let the high schooler pick her own college criteria and then select colleges that she wants to go to. I see the parent as a resource, facilitator, and support person....but whichever schools my kids wanted, was OK by me as long as they had reasons why they were appealing and why they were a good fit. I didn't analyze any data regarding my kids' schools. It seems that some parents know SO much details about each college, it is mind boggling. I have read detailed analyses of very specific data on each college in some threads on the Parents Forum, stuff I never even thought about. My kids looked for colleges and we read about them, visited them, and met with faculty and current students. We didn't do that much more than that. It seemed to be enough. The kids made all their own choices. Now that they are attending one of their first choice schools and are as happy with their choices as they were when the sent in their intent to enroll, I'm not sure what more data is needed. I suppose if a STUDENT wishes to examine that data, that's one thing. But I think it boils down to the student's personal list of college criteria, not parent analysis of detailed data, when selecting colleges to which they will apply.</p>