<p>Extremely likely after your 1st and 2nd passes, and most likely between 9th week and Spring Break.</p>
<p>Would it be unwise to sign up for one of those lectures?
What is the reason for not posting the professor?</p>
<p>I'm pretty bad at keeping track of my work hours. But if I were to give you a number... I'd say I spend around 3-6 hours on the theory of a project (including TA OH's), and around a maximum of 3 hours actually writing code/debugging (in total, and this last number is overestimated).</p>
<p>I start pretty early in the week, so I'm able to ask enough questions to get things figured out before the weekend.</p>
<p>I have weisbart for 3A right now. He's like...grad student or just graduated or something kind of professor, so really young compared to most. He can be a little confusing in lecture, but he tries his best to help his students. At least so far in 3A, he doesn't put any surprises out on midterms. He really is a nice guy....shouldn't be too bad.</p>
<p>
[quote]
Would it be unwise to sign up for one of those lectures?
What is the reason for not posting the professor?
[/quote]
</p>
<p>It doesn't matter who you get; research has shown that you only learn 30% of the material in lectures. The rest is by yourself through opening the book, doing problems sets, asking the right questions.</p>
<p>Just choose the one that makes your schedule fit. Each professor is going to teach the same thing anyways. The only difference is the difficulty in homework sets and exams, which doesn't affect what is to be covered. It's just a matter of what grade you will get, depending on an amount of effort you put in. </p>
<p>You can ignore what I just wrote if your goal is to get a good grade and nothing else. :rolleyes:</p>
<p>The reason for not posting the instructor yet is because they have finally realized that there is not enough room to accomodate the prospective 33A students. The department has to plan their schedule ahead of time to select which professors or industry member will teach a specific course (not all professors will teach every quarter). Although this is important to finalize, it is not a priority until probably the end of the quarter. That's why the instructor name is not shown, until later (but not too late, or else he/she will not have time to "prepare").</p>
<p>Anyone have any info on LAUB for Math 33A? How does he comapare with GAMELIN?</p>
<p>Anyone know if it's better to take Econ 11 before taking econ 41?</p>
<p>ah crap..</p>
<p>Ravetch 120B and McDevitt 102 together will burn me alive.. worst schedule ever.</p>
<p>ohyeahohyeah: econ 41 has nothing to do with econ 11. Take them together, it won't matter.</p>
<p>Bring up my thread.</p>
<p>Ahh, no matter how I arrange it, the perfect schedule timewise/prof-wise has me taking 3 finals on the same day. Oh noes. </p>
<p>LS3
Physics 6A
Asian American Studies 10</p>
<p>Management 1A
Music History 70:Beethoven
GE Cluster 70DW
Fiat Lux</p>
<p>I've heard Litt is much harder now. Is this true?</p>
<p>jinobi, i feel your pain. i may well be in the same boat :/</p>
<p>Yahh. I was gonna try to sub in Psych 115 for one of the bio classes, but it still has the same final day, and I wanna finish my prereqs quickly so I don't have to always do the second pass for 110/115. </p>
<p>Blah.</p>
<p>115? my friend is majorly hating that class right now. but then again she isn't psychobio, so we can avoid taking it, but she took it anyway... and i don't intend to xD</p>
<p>i want psych 120A next quarter. that would mean only 2 finals in one day. but it all depends on what (if any) education class i get...</p>
<p>...bah. that's uplifting</p>
<p>well, i was thinking of taking psych 110, but i DO NOT GET why they have two lectures on the same day. </p>
<p>at least with psych/psychobio, you can take it easy. only 3 years, yesss! ah well, why must we be at the whims of a cruel university system which seems to like sadistically torturing students into much stress over schedule planning?</p>
<p>dammit, i knew i shouldn't have taken psych 100a and 100b that early.</p>
<p>haha. i'm in 100B now. and i'm just gonna take my time and graduate in 4 years, not 3... i don't feel like trying to cram things x.x</p>
<p>ahh, that research project must be fun doing, especially with only n=11 subjects, huh? </p>
<p>"ach, but i don't have statistical significance. damn. <em>writes "Our experiment failed because..."</em></p>
<p>nah, ima take 4 years. last year is hopefully for a spanish minor.</p>
<p>lol. 18 subjects and they told us not to expect significance... now i just have to design it perfectly counterbalanced... grr.</p>
<p>ahh, latin squares. the same pattern, over, and over, and over, and over...</p>