stereotypes of these colleges?

<p>i'm looking for the stereotypes, big pictures, etc of my long list of schools... i know stereotypes aren't always accurate, but i think for any stereotype there has to be kernels of truth. if you can give me any views of the school/stereotypes/etc of any of these schools it is greatly appreciated! thanks</p>

<p>loyola marymount
pitzer
northeastern
clemson
tulane
university of maryland
univ. of san diego
ucsb
wake forest
gwu
scripps
ucsd
berkeley
uva
barnard
claremont mckenna
emory
georgetown
ucla
usc
brown
columbia
duke
pomona
stanford</p>

<p>Take a look at Princeton Review.</p>

<p>anyone.....?</p>

<p>Set it up like a game...name a school, give stereotype challenge to pick 3 things about the school, and have next person to pick another school for the following person...Like this:</p>

<p>Pomona: kids who researched their school well, - happy, smart, nice kids, - best school no one's heard of</p>

<p>Stanford (your turn, or whomever reads this thread and wants to participate):</p>

<p>Stanford - ultra competitive school for really smart kids in the middle of nowhere; admissions all over the map (accepting kids with horrible SATs if they've, for example, published a novel...rejecting 2390s for no reason...)</p>

<p>Next: Dartmouth</p>

<p>Dartmouth- cold?</p>

<p>MIT</p>

<p>MIT - nerdy students; ugly students; lots of math; pocket protectors; no girls</p>

<p>I'm going to pause the game. For the sake of convenience to the OP, I'll try to answer a lot of these:</p>

<p>Northeastern- co-op ("learn by working") school in Boston; student body is pretty "normal"...lots of my friends who aren't Ivy League material but still smart, responsible, nice guys want to go here</p>

<p>Wake- somewhat conservative "southern" student body, but trying to make itself seem more diverse, like a smaller, less research oriented version of Duke; one friend visited and said it felt a bit like a country club</p>

<p>UVa- large-ish public school; because Virginia has so many "Tiers" of public schools, you don't get the "average" in-state students here, so it still feels like a competitive private; I visited...student body isn't as "preppy" as some claim it is, though groups REALLY tend to self-segregate; beautiful campus, a true college town, kinda the archetypal college experience offered here</p>

<p>Duke- as mentioned before, a cosmopolitan (and liberal) oasis in the South; lots of research opportunities and lots of upper-middle class Yankees</p>

<p>Georgetown- another school only semi-accurately labeled as "preppy"; very goal-oriented students that are smart but not terribly intellectual (they care more about making money in the real world than they care about Plato); crowded "lived-in" campus is really homey and lively</p>

<p>Brown- the smartest, wildest hippies you'll ever find mixed in with some ultrarich Rockefeller Republican types</p>

<p>Maryland- lots of above-average New Jersey kids who didn't quite cut it for the selective privates</p>

<p>GWU- like Georgetown, but not as selective, prestigious, or competitive; while both G'town and GW attract politics nerds (you know, the ones who spend all there time at model un/congress), GW has more of them per capita than the more well-rounded Georgetown student body</p>

<p>Columbia- liberal smart kids, but more stuffy and subdued than Brown</p>

<p>Emory- lots of Jewish northerners who like warm weather and have the brains/grades/work ethic so they come here</p>

<p>Clemson- rising star amongst public schools, but still has a way to go before being deemed "top tier"; student body is Southern and religious but becoming more diverse each year</p>

<p>Barnard- Columbia girls...</p>

<p>That's all I can help you with. Not familiar with the west. </p>

<p>KEEP IN MIND THAT THE ABOVE ARE ALL STEREOTYPES</p>

<p>thanks for all the help, i like the game idea (:</p>

<p>maybe i'll continue with... usc?</p>

<p>pausing the game again :P</p>

<p>Well for most of these i know absolutely nothing but I'll answer for ones I do. Most are probably not true but it's what i've heard</p>

<p>tulane - i've always thought of tulane as really good but i heard its a party school
university of maryland - racist and cliquey students, above-average but not excellent
gwu - not a good enough school to justify the cost
berkeley - best public school, nothing bad i can say really
uva - second best public school
brown - pretentious students
columbia - very liberal atmosphere (not a bad thing imo :))
duke - cliquey, full of snotty rich kids
stanford - nothing bad to say about this one. except maybe URMs get too much of an edge in admissions compared to other schools</p>

<p>pitzer - hippie, alternative, very liberal
university of maryland - lots of commuters, big greek scene
ucsb - druggie culture on beach, beautiful campus, crummy housing
gwu - no campus
ucsd - great location, no social scene
uva - preppy, sports and greek oriented
barnard - backdoor to columbia
claremont mckenna - preprofessional, work hard, play hard
georgetown - preppy
ucla - stands for "u see lots of asians"
usc- bad neighborhood, not great academics
brown - very liberal,
columbia - pretentious, all about nyc
duke - heavily greek , sports focused</p>

<p>USC - that it's public (it's not), tough to get in, great film school</p>

<p>Tulane</p>