<p>I was contemplating the subject tests I will taking in October. They were originally going to be Math IIC, US History, and Chemistry, because I just had AP US History and a chemistry course this past year, and Math II is basically a requirement for subject tests. Now, I have been reconsidering Chemistry in favor of Literature, primarily because it involves less relearning of material, which means less studying, which means a less hectic first month back to school. However, I do not want to eschew Chemistry should it lessen my chances of acceptance. Would Chemistry or Literature have any difference in admissions (i.e. would adcoms look less favorably on one of them)?</p>
<p>And, while I am asking, is my perception about the two tests correct, in terms of required studying?</p>
<p>I don't think there would be a big difference between Chemistry or Literature, but to tell you the truth idk. However for the second question... If you're an avid reader and score well for CR on the SAT I, then yes, Literature would probably require less studying. On the other hand, if you're not really into reading and English in general, then Literature may require more studying/practice than Chemistry. Of course this has just been from my experience... I guess it depends on where your talents lie.</p>
<p>I'm really not more of anything. I used to think I was a math/science person back when I sucked at CR, but now that I learned how to analyze prose/poetry, I really don't have the same level of obvious academic strength.</p>
<p>if you're not sure I would say just stick to Chem b/c if you study the material you're guaranteed to score decently on the test. For Literature however, there isn't a sure way of mastering it, other than taking a lot of practice tests or reading prose/poetry/books as you mentioned.</p>