<p>Is this possible? I have the credit necessary on the BC exam to skip both 31 and 32, but I personally feel that I'm much more grounded in the BC material (didn't do as well on my AB subscore).</p>
<p>I personally don’t think anyone on this forum will know. The next step is to call the Math department at 919.660.2800. Plus they can give you a better answer than we ever could.</p>
<p>have you thought about taking math41?</p>
<p>technically, there shouldn’t be a policy that prevent you from doing that as AP calc AB and BC are separate tests and you receive separate AP credits. I was able to decline AP Physics C Mech credit but keep E/M. Realistically, call the math department.</p>
<p>Honestly, I can’t see an academic advisor being ok with that. Retaking 31 and 32, or just 32, or going to 103 probably would, but retaking 31 and not 32 is iffy. If you did it, you would have to enroll in a different schedule from what you gave your advisor and hope that the automated ACES system sees you as eligible to take them.</p>
<p>Really, I don’t think a 5 subscore for AB is necessary for 103. For 103, you just need to know how to differentiate and integrate simple functions (not even the harder ones, and advanced integration like trig sub or int. by parts is definitely not required knowledge).</p>
<p>I disagree, I remember using trig identities and int by parts in 103. It all depends on the professor. The material itself might not demand the knowledge, but if your prof was dick and gave you such a problem on the test then not knowing how to do it could screw you over.</p>
<p>Weird, Bray definitely went out of his way to modify his test questions to make them easier for us to integrate, and our final exam did not have any hard integrations at all.</p>
<p>I remember I had math profs who used integration by parts and stuff. Those things come in handy when doing proofs. My 108 prof would assign proofs for hw which half the class didn’t get then show us the easy way to do them using obscure trig identities and stuff then act all astonished that we didn’t know to use them. He was still a nice guy though.</p>
<p>wait who was ur math 108 prof?, sounds kind of like schwartz</p>
<p>Hamzi, he was a visiting prof from one of the UCs, I think Davis. Idk if he’s still around.</p>
<p>Hamzi, he was a visiting prof from one of the UCs, Davis I think. Idk if he’s still around.</p>