<p>and SATs is NO WHERE NEAR a measure of intelligence or IQ... you gotta be sh**ting me.</p>
<p>Same here...I love this movie.</p>
<p>-Ender</p>
<p>
[quote]
i got a 74
[/quote]
</p>
<p>yeah yeah yeah yeah</p>
<p>the stoner that gets into Stanford.... hehehe hella funny.</p>
<p>lol I love Jack Black...</p>
<p>"Hey, it's Sean"
"SEAN pick up the phone......he's not here"
"I need you to see if the mail's here"
"Do I need to turn on the computer"
"No...go to the front door. The mail would be in the mailox"</p>
<p>-Ender</p>
<p>President George W. Bush scored 566 verbal and 640 math in his SAT's, for a total of 1206. On the chart below, 1206 translates to 124 IQ in the first column (the more common 15 Standard Deviations in IQ). An SAT-IQ formula announced in 2004 by Case Western researchers also yields 124 IQ for a 1206 SAT score</p>
<p>Al Gore, Bush's 2000 opponent got 1355 on his SAT, or 134 IQ on the chart below. This matches well with the IQ's of 133 and 134 Gore received in IQ tests he took at the beginning of his high school freshman and senior years.</p>
<p>Still no correlation people?</p>
<p>umm I don't see why you need to use presidential candidates as examples to prove that SAT corresponds to intelligence, after all its only two people. The only thing that anyone can ever be sure that the SAT measures is how well someone can take the SAT. (also I fail to see how SAT scores aren't multiples of 10, but this may be the older SAT's method)</p>
<p>Thank you for taking the IQ Test at <a href="http://www.IQTest.com%5B/url%5D">www.IQTest.com</a>.</p>
<p>We are confirming that your IQ Test score was: 164</p>
<p>Lol. wtf. This is definately inflated.</p>
<p>IQ is of little importance. Passed the 120 mark, a higher rating only gives a marginal boost even for those in the "unmeasurable genius" range.</p>
<p>There were some interesting articles published about what are the defining characterstics of a genius (think Shakespeare, Einstein, etc. - hell, even Michael Jordan). Each one says that IQ helps, but past certain points (usually around 120), it's benefits are marginal. The true marks of genius tend to be developed spacial reasoning (being able to visualize a problem), kinesthetic something of the other (having a gut instinct), and of course logic/reasoning (like the ability to solve math problems and whatnot). When you have all three qualities and use them in conjunction, you'll get extraordinary results.</p>
<p>They gave an example of Einstein where he was able to see the problem in his head, his fingertips had a gentle burning that "lead him in the right direction," and of course his math, blah blah blah.</p>
<p>I got 147... not as high as some on this thread but still pretty good.</p>
<p>Orange County was an alright movie... except...
(DON'T READ ON IF YOU HAVEN'T SEEN!) </p>
<p>the kid decides to go to some CC instead of Stanford at the end of the film. I know it is a movie and all, but how could he pass up Stanford for that!</p>
<p>You know what I seem to remember an AP test or a PSAT or SOME standardized test in which one of the passages was about the definition of a genius. Heh. Who knew those things would come in handy?</p>
<p>Heh. I actually found the SAT reading passages pretty intresting. They talked about a broad range of subjects that I wouldn't ordinarily read about like underground geysers or the parallels between black literature and female literature of the 1800s.</p>
<p>The SAT II Writing passages...that's a whole different story.</p>
<p>SAT II Lit passages...</p>
<p>I was beyond being annoyed...I was actually amazed. After each one I thought to myself "The guys at College Board couldn't possibly find anything more boring than this..."</p>
<p>Next page.....wow. Amazing.</p>
<p>I actually tried to hang myself...I think I got some extra points.</p>
<p>-Ender</p>
<p>gotta like ethiopas iq, only about 15 points below retard level. Africa is the place to be nowadays (in reference to the sat to iq conversion site)</p>
<p>also, high IQ does not mean high success in life. Some people are so caught up with being intellectual and "intelligent" that they forget about the many fine points of life.</p>
<p>140
Top Civil Servants; Professors and Research Scientists. </p>
<p>130
Physicians and Surgeons; Lawyers; Engineers (Civil and Mechanical) </p>
<p>120
School Teachers; Pharmacists; Accountants; Nurses; Stenographers; Managers. </p>
<p>110
Foremen; Clerks; Telephone Operators; Salesmen; Policemen; Electricians. </p>
<p>100+
Machine Operators; Shopkeepers; Butchers; Welders; Sheet Metal Workers. </p>
<p>100-
Warehousemen; Carpenters; Cooks and Bakers; Small Farmers; Truck and Van Drivers. </p>
<p>90
Laborers; Gardeners; Upholsterers; Farmhands; Miners; Factory Packers and Sorters.</p>
<p>this stupid chart put up by some elitist muthaf***ers who thinks that IQ will predict their future jobs... now, in poorer countries like China and such, this has no meaning whatsoever. Not to mention your social background has about 1000000 times more to do with you than IQ. If you come from a really rich rich family, you might end up professor of Business or some such because your family, since you were small, was focused on it. This is a HORRIBLE HORRIBLE elitist and pretentious idea that being more intelligent means that you will be higher on the social ladder.</p>
<p>Now why would a physician be ranked lower in intelligence than a professor? Well, I guess it depends on what school the professor works at, but still...the avg. physcician should be > avg. professor.</p>
<p>IQ Test: 145</p>
<p>it may be some indication, but i really wouldnt take it seriously.. esp that job thing.. teachers are smarter than a lot of professors.. its simply where they wanted to go.. okay maybe not simply. but still.</p>
<p>hey rani, i agree with you re: teachers, somewhat</p>
<p>those iq tests are silly, i've gotten some random results that I know are wrong (high 170s and stuff). there are plenty of hi-iq societies to join, if you're interested</p>