@parentologist the math thing was confusing to me too. When I was in high school you took precalc junior year (or earlier if you were unusually advanced, but most kids weren’t) and then senior year you chose either AB or BC calculus. I think I could probably have counted on one hand the number of kids in my grade who were more advanced in math (and most of them left and went to the state STEM boarding school). At my son’s high school, a bunch of kids who took “double compacted” math in middle school take algebra II as freshmen, precalc sophomore year, and then either AB jr year/BC sr year or (maybe more typically) a summer calculus course between sophomore and junior year, BC calculus junior year, and multivariable calculus +/- AP statistics senior year. They don’t let students opt into BC Calc without either having taken AB or the summer program.
I’m okay with my son taking the summer bridge math course because he expressed an interest in doing so without our involvement. I think several friends are doing it too.
He doesn’t know what he wants to study. He’s gotten better grades in STEM subjects because he doesn’t like to write or do literary analysis – but he’s interested in history, languages, travel, maps, potentially psychology, potentially geology, maybe something like physics or engineering but that’s looking less likely. (one of the things I love about Wooster is the opportunity to do a 3+2 program with WUSTL or Case Western Reserve.)
He did do a French immersion program last summer where he lived with a host family and went to classes every day. It helped his French, but not nearly as much as a full year program would have done. He’s talking about doing a gap year as an exchange student in Belgium or Germany – I’m bullish on the idea for a lot of reasons but I have a hunch that if he applies to college as a senior and gets in somewhere that excites him, he might have a tough time deferring.
Re: Bates/Carleton sorts of schools…this is a dilemma for us. I personally think it’s a long shot, given what I’ve seen in Naviance and read around here. If he falls hard for a school like Kenyon, Lafayette, or Macalester, he might want to do early decision there for peace of mind – I don’t think any of those would be a slam dunk for him (would be happy to be wrong). I’m also mindful of the fact that he’s picked a middle path thus far, and there’s wisdom in not pushing him into a place where he’s surrounded by people who have vastly more evolved study skills/senses of ambition. (I speak from personal experience here – Princeton AB and Stanford MBA. In both places I felt like an imposter.) That said, we’ll visit Carleton in February, along with Macalester and St Olaf. If there’s a discernible difference and he’s excited about trying for it, we won’t stop him.
@NiceUnparticularMan raises a valid point – our kid is good at test taking, less good at some other things, and my goal is that any school to which he’d apply should be a place where we think he could learn and grow from contact with his peers.
@MMRose we did explore the idea of both Canadian schools and St. Andrews/University of Edinburgh in Scotland. Two things give me pause: a) the need (in Scotland anyway) to commit to a course of study sooner and b) the level of executive function/independence expected (my kiddo has ADHD with all that this would imply.)