<p>Just read the first two and final pages of this thread, so some but not all..</p>
<p>Echoing an earlier poster who commented on the extra processes required by
performing arts candidates in theater or music (auditions); art studio kids who want to submit a slide portfolio for review at a university or LAC; film students who need to send in an original piece, this is on top of the essays! Read the musical theater thread around March and weep for those parents and kids who are running around and staying in motels for brief, high stakes auditions and l0% admit rates to the department (some of them), the same week the school report in AP is due. By then some of their peers will just be chilling or cowering, waiting for the mailbox or with rolling admits in hand...and those performance guys are still at it in March; plus they've also done all the same essays the previous Fall. </p>
<p>But I'm very glad, actually. S wants to become a writer professionally, for film or TV. The places where he got IN were those that also asked for a supplementary portfolio. They all gave original screenplay prompts ("two boys waiting for their father's funeral" "three strangers sit in a hospital waiting room.." and other choices), and they had to write a 3 page script. These were all due at the same time, or at most 3 weeks later, than the rest of the college essays and main application.</p>
<p>Wherever he had a chance to write creatively as described above, he got IN.
WHerever he wasn't allowed to send in his writing, he got REJECTED. All the rest was virtually the same: scores, transcripts, main essays, short answers.
Each of the 8 schools required different treatment, with some minimal tweaking on the big essays and virtually no recycling of short answers. </p>
<p>It really did feel like a meat grinder here last Fall, so I sympathize with OP to a degree.</p>
<p>BUT -- don't know if this has been said yet: colleges are also trying to put together a community, a cohort. I think if they can sense from one's approach to ANY long essay a sense of "I respond to my environment" they know the kid will be a curious, productive person on their campus. It's about the kid's overall approach to new stimuli, as well as what they've done in the past re: accomplishments, that makes them a positive addition to their campus. </p>
<p>Ultimately, I think that is felt by the AdCom intuitively, when reading the essays. Does this sound like the kind of person that will take full advantage of the resources our school has to offer? That can be sensed no matter what the topic: how the kid responded to the new family resident (grandparent with Alzheimers & two terriers moving in!) or seeing the cats at Reed College.</p>
<p>So actually I think a kid could also write on a "hackneyed" topic if that's what is truly them, but evidence an approach that shows responsiveness to that old topic. I don't feel kids should be dissuaded from this or that topic. They're not there to entertain the AdComs. I guess I would look for sincerity, no matter what... </p>
<p>But I'm just a parent, not an Adcom, so I'm guessing not knowing, obviously!</p>