<p>Definitely B.</p>
<p>I say B as well.</p>
<p>Yes, it’s B. Beccaria was a philosophe who studied legal reform.</p>
<p>This is kinda easy, but here goes:
Germany’s designs for the rapid takeover of France during WWI was called…
A. Anschluss
B. the Schlieffen Plan
C. Blitzkrieg
D. Franco-Prussian Assault</p>
<p>^Lol, yep very easy. B is the answer.</p>
<p>I’m pretty sure it’s B.</p>
<p>:) I tried to make i hard by making them all German related, but you’re both right. Anschluss was the annexation of Austria in 1938, Blitzkrieg was the WWII strategy of “lightening war” (first tested by the Germans in the Spanish Civil War), and the Franco-Prussian Assault doesn’t exist, although the Franco-Prussian War was in 1870 and resulted in a Prussian victory and ceded Alsace-Lorraine to Prussia (this was a major source of contention after it was given back to the French after the Treaty of Versailles).</p>
<p>All of the following are ways in which the Northern Renaissance differed from that which arose in Italy, except that it</p>
<ol>
<li>came later in time.</li>
<li>used the printing press more effectively.</li>
<li>relied more on kings as patrons of art and letters.</li>
<li>examined and imitated classical works.</li>
<li>focused more on writing than on sculpture and painting.</li>
</ol>
<ol>
<li>I don’t remember reading about kings patronizing any Northern Renaissance humanists and scholars.</li>
</ol>
<p>I’m confused by this question… these are all ways that it is different, except that-
Does that mean we’re looking for the one that is similar? I’m probably just being very stupid right now 
sorry</p>
<p>^the information being similar or being incorrect is what you are looking for.</p>
<p>Scrivener, it’s an “except” question. 4 choices are true, and you need to find the false one. I had trouble understanding the question, too.</p>
<p>I’m thinking it’s 3. I don’t remember any mention of kings patronizing works. 4 would be my second choice, but the fact that both Renaissances dealt with classicism makes me think that 3 is the better choice.</p>
<p>I think it’s 3 because in the North there were more filthy rich merchants and business people than kings.</p>
<p>Sorry, that was a bad question. I got it wrong too, so that’s why I posted it.
The answer is actually 4 because all Renaissance scholars focused on classical works.</p>
<ol>
<li>Did the treaty of augsberg only affect Germany?</li>
<li>Did the Edict of Nantes only affect France?</li>
<li>What the heck is the “putting out system” ?</li>
<li>What is the “price revolution” ??</li>
</ol>
<p>I’m not entirely sure myself… The Peace of Ausburg allowed for German princes to accept whether to observe Lutheranism or Catholicism. The other affects (outside Germany) would be that it weakened papal authority.</p>
<p>The Edict of Nantes main affect was that it stopped the religious wars of France, although, when Louis XIV revocated it, many of the educated French Huguenots left France and headed to countries that were France’s enemies (like England and Holland).</p>
<p>I’ve got no idea what the “putting out system” is, although the price revolution was caused by continent-wide inflation from 1450s-1650s brought on by the increase of precious metals from the New World and by the population boom following the Black Death</p>
<p>The putting out system was the “old order” before the Agricultural Revolution, where the cottage industry ruled basically all of England. The putting out system is just a fancy name for the cottage industry.</p>
<p>Hmmmm… since we’re kinda on the topic, I’ll throw a short FRQ out there:
Describe the Enclosure Movement and its effect on the industrial revolution in England.</p>
<p>I feel really iffy about answering the free response questions and DBQs. How often do you practice the essays for the AP test?</p>
<p>I second this… can anyone give some general FRQ and DBQ advice? I’ve never taken a history AP before, and I’m self studying European, so it would be very helpful.</p>