<p>^^^whoever said all asians were one-sided math students?</p>
<p>I said that they were more often one-sided math students, which i believe most people would agree is just a fact. </p>
<p>And if they are more often math-oriented, then it would be obvious that they would be rejected more often because they are competing against the larger pool of math oriented students.</p>
<p>Ks wat are you proving...</p>
<p>Those are the majors for all students, not just the majors for asians. </p>
<p>Basically all of those statistics really dont carry much wait seeing as the MAJORITY of the students are white.... (w/ the exception of the UC riverside survey)</p>
<p>And i dissagree, asians at elite schools tend to be more likely to fit the asian stereotype than asians at 2nd tier schools.</p>
<p>tyler -
[quote]
asians are disproportionately sheer math-oriented
[/quote]
</p>
<p>Who said anything about anyone claiming that ALL asians were one-sided math students?</p>
<p>
[quote]
Basically all of those statistics really dont carry much wait seeing as the MAJORITY of the students are white.... (w/ the exception of the UC riverside survey)
[/quote]
</p>
<p>Uhh, the statistics for CUNY were only for Asian students and UCB and UCR are NOT majority white - the biggest group is Asians at 43%.</p>
<p>
[quote]
And i dissagree, asians at elite schools tend to be more likely to fit the asian stereotype than asians at 2nd tier schools.
[/quote]
</p>
<p>LOL!!! So assimilated Asians or "bananas" or "twinkies" (who make up the bulk of Asians attending the elite private universities) are more apt to fit the stereotype?</p>
<p>Gee, then what do terms such as "banana", "twinky", "whitewashed", etc. signify?</p>
<p>Anything else?</p>
<p>^trackstar above</p>