<p>bclintonk–I apologize for what you called a low blow–I was defending my supposed ilk and extended the metaphor a bit too much. And, btw, not all of what I said was aimed at you specifically either–I merely used your post as a jumping off point. Sorry if that was unclear to you. It’s just the general attitude that those from the NE and those whose kids apply to ivies are all the same and are so misguided as to practically be pitied is a bit hard to swallow for me. </p>
<p>I’m wondering what a class val from a top HS with perfect SATs, an astronomical GPA, etc. should aspire to–a CC? D’s HS val had highest GPA ever recorded at their school, did major scientific research, and won several prestigious nat’l awards/competitions in several different disciplines, and achieved 5’s on 14 APs just for starters. She only applied to 6 ivies and was accepted at all. Her scientist parents both were ivy grads with advanced degrees. Her 2 older brothers both class sals also went ivy. No one, not family, friends, GCs, teachers would ever have suggested she look elsewhere. Many were jealous of her and sneered at her behind her back, but no one ever said she didn’t belong at an ivy or should consider state u or anything else. Just wondering what a kid like that should aim for so no one thinks her to be parochial?</p>
<p>Anyway, bclintonk-- these are your words:</p>
<p>“I never said “elitism.” I said “parochialism,” as in “regional chauvinism.” Many Northeasterners mistakenly conflate the two because they automatically assume their region is “elite,” but in my view that’s just one more manifestation of their parochialism
;-)”</p>
<p>And that is still a dig. You deny calling NE’ers elitist but you say “they automatically assume their region is “elite,” …” I don’t see a tremendous difference. The implication is virtually the same. Saying it’s “one more manifestation of their parochialism” is not exactly a compliment either–even when followed by the winky face. ;-)</p>
<p>Evidently you added the following while I was cogitating:</p>
<p>"(Let me hasten to add that I say this all in good fun as a “reformed” Northeasterner myself, having spent more of my adult life in the Northeast than in any other region). "</p>
<p>So, I now see that you edited your post to include this parenthetical addendum–btw, had I read this I most likely would have responded slightly differently. But why you need to characterize yourself as “reformed” is a head-scratcher–as if being from the NE is a disease like alcoholism that you need to leave and go to an out-of-region rehab to get it out of your system. So, forgive my stinging words, but I still don’t agree with your assessment, nor do I think it was such good fun for everyone.</p>
<p>I realize I shouldn’t get caught up in this oneupsmanship and should confine my comments to the more positive kind. So, in the true spirit of the NMD’s OP and his exceptional D’s accomplishments–I say bygones to all who disagree with me and wish to label me and mine. I hope that all those who do not get into the schools they think are ideal find a great home elsewhere and find some solace in NMD’s D’s inspiring journey.</p>