The Official Bio Nov 4 Thread

Test Preparation SAT Subject Test Preparation
121

<p>I didn't take E, Anonymous91. Remember any questions from the core bio part?</p>

<p>For everyone who is retaking this test, how are you going to study differently? I thought I was ready using PR and some Kaplan, but apparently not!</p>

122

<p>yea, how about the inverse of the data given. Which one was it, if its the inverse its the one that goes down and then levels out?</p>

123

<p>I'll try to get my AP Bio book back again for the next month =[</p>

124

<p>i think im going to cancel. If i cancel, it will just be like I didnt take the test right? Also if i take it again in dec, and dont get what i want i can keep that score, and hopefully get what i want in jan</p>

125

<p>i don't know if i should cancel...weighing my options
it depends on the curve...according to the blue book it shouldnt be bad but i was surprised in june with my score, so i dont know now</p>

126

<p>oh yea also about punctuated equalibrium ? I said a new species appears fast but barely changes. Is this right?</p>

<p>Also was this test harder than the last one/ cb book?</p>

127

<p>and why were there mass exctinctions? i said c-12</p>

128

<p>not sure about that question - didn't take E.</p>

<p>i hope the curve will be nice =)</p>

129

<p>im buggin out...would ~8 wrong be above 750?</p>

130

<p>possibly, if 3-4 is still an 800.</p>

131

<p>what do you guys think 12 wrong 3 skip will be, 680+?</p>

132

<p>Meh. dont know.</p>

<p>im ****ed. collegeboard is cancelling my bio test cos the proctors told me something i was gonna do was fine. heh. im retaking SATII in january.</p>

133

<p>i cancelled it on purpose, no reason in keeping it if im gonna retake it anyway. Im retaking in January also.</p>

134

<p>im pretty sure the limiting nutrient was Po</p>

135

<p>are u sure?</p>

136

<p>yeah, why would it be PO? didn't PO grow the tallest?
i put N i think...</p>

137

<p>yeah same here</p>

138

<p>was the pedigree thing x linked recessive</p>

139

<p>Yep! I checked that after the test in my PR study guide.
I wasn't sure whether to put x-linked dominant during the test, because the pedigree didn't seem to skip generations (as it normally does in recessive), but I think that because females are carriers technically the disease did skip a generation.</p>

<p>Can someone confirm?</p>

140

<p>i said that too.</p>