<p>Prompt: "Is the world changing for the better?"</p>
<p>Unfortunately in today's dystopian world throughout the past several decades, the world has not been changing for the better. Though there are many instances in which someone has stood up to views held by the majority in order to make the world a better place, the tyranny of most in the world still subjugates the the minority. Many examples from literature support this simple yet disturbing viewpoint that we live in a static world of chaos rather than a dynamic world of progress.</p>
<p>Modern views of racism throughout the world still permeate throughout every inch of society. To Kill a Mockingbird, a novel by Harper Lee, illustrates this concern well. In this story about racism, Atticus Finch fights for the life of an innocent black man convicted of rape. Although there is overwhelming evidence propitious to the defending party, the white men of the jury still decide to wrongly convict the black man. This demonstrates that even though there are men such as Atticus Finch who are willing to fight for the inalienable rights of the men persecuted throughout the globe, the majority of men, fully aware of their own moral turpitude, still continue to persecute others. This halts the supposed progressive trend of the world and supports the view that men are not transcending themselves to nobler viewpoints regarding the rights of men.</p>
<p>Just as we live in a world in which racism flourishes, we also live in a world in which war prospers, moving ourselves towards the belligerent trend of fighting for meaningless abstract feelings of "honor" and "integrity." A Farewell to Arms by Ernest Hemingway demonstrates this through its attacking of war's foundations. The protagonist, Frederic Henry, sees meaningless bloodshed spread throughout the otherwise normally beautiful Italian countryside. He ruminates about the causes of war and sees that they amount to trivial abstract ideals such as "honor" and "integrity" when men should really be fighting for concrete things such as rivers, land, and family. This once again contradicts the popular view that the world is changing for the better, for it shows that in this world, men are willing to fight for dogmatic ideals than for the lives of others.</p>
<p>As well as the fact that we live in an unchanging world where war exemplifies the pugnacious nature of men, we live in a world where war is used to justify the actions of totalitarian governments whose goal is to oppress all for some sort of "greater good." Catch-22, a novel by Joseph Heller, shows this well, for tyranny of the majority who abuse power those who are apethetic to this oppression are shown. Men such as Yossarian and Snowden are needlessly persecuted and forced to fight for the cause of others in power. A world of anarchy is present in which men are forced to fight for the causes of others. This is a world that we still live in today, showing the static nature of Earth.</p>
<p>In our chaotic yet static planet, the world has not deviated from its path of wreckless racism, violence, and oppression. It is a dark world we live in and a disturbing truth that man has not progressed and changed his views for the better.</p>
<p>****Note that that does not accurately reflect my actual viewpoints, but I saw that with the examples I could think of, I could write a negative essay more easily than a positive one. Plus, I used the word dystopian. That got me goin'</p>
<p>Please don't hesitate to grade the already posted essays, which I will do when I have time unless someone gets to them before I do; I just took a practice test in which my usual MC Writing grade took a turn for the worse and I encountered some hard math, so I want to find out how to do them.</p>