<p>What a witty comeback! haha, nobody would have ever thought of that ingenious ripoff of mine.</p>
<p>^Ad hominems again. Dang, practice what you preach.</p>
<p>
LOL! You took 10 minutes to come with this? Classic.
<em>Waves my 34 score report in front of Buzz’s snapping, drooling jaws</em> You want it, bud? Gooo fetch (again)!</p>
<p>
Lol, feeling left out, are we? You do realize neither of us are discussing logical fallacies? How incredibly dense.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>Sorry, unlike you I don’t sit in front on my monitor constantly refreshing the page. I love how your post was a single minute after mine. You’ve been waiting 10 minutes for me? You never cease to impress. :P</p>
<p>Nah, not left out as you may hope, but instead just trying to figure out why you would refute buzz22’s posts for a page with ad hominem rebuttals and then go on to fire ad hominems back at him later.</p>
<p>
Says the guy with the 27. Umm, yeah… I wasn’t the one waiting for hours on CC yesterday waiting for someone to respond. That would be you. Sheer hypocrisy here, folks!</p>
<p>
Ad Hominem? Please. I think we’re just basically flaming each other right now. You can go ahead and call those ad hominems though, if you want. Wow, you seriously are dense.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>I wasn’t on CC for hours yesterday.</p>
<p>^ Sure, you weren’t. Don’t try and deny it.</p>
<p>
</p>
<p>I guess this nullifies all your “fallacy” arguments since you’ve given up on that idea. If not, that invokes a fallacy on it’s own, called “special pleading.” Go look it up, kiddo. :)</p>
<p>
Says the guy with the 27. Didn’t you see the reason why I gave up on the logical fallacies idea? It’s cause you completely ignored post #70, kiddo.</p>
<p>Buzz22, you are a SMART man.</p>
<p>Are you guys honestly still going at it? It’s the girl I sit next to in Spanish that flips out because she is only 15 points ahead of required in participation credit. Let it die, please.</p>
<p>^ We had let it go… until Buzz revived a 3 day old thread pointlessly, that is.</p>
<p>i dont see why ACTTester cant be disappointed with his score. he wanted a 35 and got 34.</p>
<p>
Thanks but we all are in comparison to this fool. In fact, I feel so much better about my 27, now knowing that you can score high and still be a total dunce.</p>
<p>
But it’s so entertaining to predict and read ACTTester’s idotic posts. You should join in and see how fun it is. Oh by the way, ACTTester would call you out for having ignorant and false anecdotal evidence. </p>
<p>Can anyone take any guesses as to what ACTTester is trying to compensate for? ECs? Lack of friends? Lack of intelligence? If we can’t figure it out at this point, I’ll try posting more stimulus to illicit more responses from it. I might even poke it with a stick to see what happens.</p>
<p>
Says the true dunce with the 27. 
I really have to know: do people at your school make fun of you calling others “dunces” when you have a 27? It would really seem like it. Dumb kid is dumb. Oh and I see the truth is out: you have to make yourself feel better about your 27. Haha.
Lol, says the guy with the 27 and a lack of life (who also doesn’t know how to spell “idiotic”).
It entertains me to no end how someone with a 27 on the ACT and a sucky SAT score can say someone else has a “lack of intelligence”. Hahahah.
<em>Waves my 34 score report in front of Buzz’s snapping, drooling jaws</em> You want it, bud? Gooo fetch (again)!</p>
<p>Someone please ban ACTTester.</p>
<p>^ Someone please ban this ignorant New Member that nobody even knows.</p>