<p>Yale has a a high cost of attendance and a lovely campus, as do many, many, many other colleges – nothing unique there.</p>
<p>What I find off-putting about Yale is its (their?) sense of elitism and an underlying hypocrisy in its admissions attitude. For example, do they seriously believe they have a monopoly on making students the leaders of tomorrow?? Quote from Yale admissions page: “Decade after decade, Yalies have set out to make our world better. We are looking for students we can help to become the leaders of their generation in whatever they wish to pursue.” Is this theory borne out in the data on Yale graduates and where they are today? The four Yale grads I personally know are by no means distinguishable from others in their fields – a university professor of economics, an insurance defense lawyer, an underemployed former investment adviser and a stay-at-home mom who used to work for a non-profit. For the most part, these are everyday people leading everyday lives.</p>
<p>And how does Yale go about finding its potential leaders of tomorrow? Look carefully at the Yale admissions team’s advice on who is likely to get accepted. High academic achievement and “drive” (not so-called “passion”) are the predominant characteristics Yale seeks in its successful applicants. Also, the admissions page quotes a former Yale president: I am inclined to believe that the person who gives every ounce to do something superbly has an advantage over the person whose capacities may be great but who seems to have no desire to stretch them to their limit. I think you would agree these qualities are not the primary characteristics required to develop strong leaders of tomorrow, and I’m sure the data would indicate otherwise.</p>
<p>After I received a thoughtful letter from Yale inviting me to consider the school, I visited the campus and found the students I met to be somewhat frenetic, nervous and uptight, i.e., not relaxed or seemingly able to have some fun. Yale appeals to me personally because of its low student to faculty ratio in the fields I’m interested in studying, its study abroad program and its research opportunities. Due to family circumstances, I’ve had to quit crew and the majority of my other ECs to get a job working a substantial number of hours during the school year as well as full-time during the summer. Despite my having a 2400 on my SAT and a near-perfect GPA, do you honestly think Yale admissions would value or take a chance on a person like me?</p>
<p>More importantly, why should I want to attend an institution that is so lopsided in its sense of which students are “worthy” of attending? I found the school to be seriously lacking in diversity.</p>
<p>Your daughter would get an excellent education at Yale, but, again, Yale by no means has a monopoly on education. The chemistry, calculus, French lit, economics, etc. she would learn at Yale is the same chemistry, calculus, french, econ, etc she would learn/study at the majority of the thousands of institutions of higher learning in the US.</p>
<p>These are simply the observations of a 17 year old, but it seems to me there are far too many high school students who are too quick to give away their power to top-tier schools at the expense of their feelings of self-worth. When examined closely, what does Yale offer over other schools? A prestigious name. </p>
<p>After I visit a school that holds some appeal for me, I have an exercise I do: I substitute its name with the name of my local commuter college, and ask myself, would I attend this school if it were named _____ College? I’ve already eliminated several supposed top-tier schools from my list based on this exercise of looking beyond the name to see if the community is one I would want to be part of.</p>