<p>It's certainly encouraging to hear that some kids who don't have access to conferences, competitions, specialized schools, etc. indeed manage to get into the most competitive MT programs. I wonder though, as the numbers of kids auditioning continue to grow and the competition becomes more and more difficult, whether things like regional competitions, awards, on-site visits from colleges, etc. are not becoming more critical to how schools make the final decisions about which of the many talented kids to pick. I'd think that this could be particularly likely for the 5 to 10 "top" MT programs. It might not be the awards, activities, or programs per se that are necessarily valuable, but instead might be the benefit that the kids get from the experiences themselves - going through numerous auditions, making connections, etc. Still, it's hard to imagine that the resume doesn't come into play when schools have to pick among dozens of equally talented students.</p>
<p>Based on our own limited experience this year, I'd suggest that kids and parents consider all these factors - not just the perceived talent level of your kid - when preparing the list of schools to apply to and audition for. We were naive in not being aware of how likely it is that kids could be just as talented as ours, but also have benefited from being exposed to so many other activities beyond just high school, community theatre and summer programs.</p>
<p>Here's an example that might help other parents out there like me who don't have any background in or much knowledge of the theatre world. Thinking back, I now realize that there are an amazing number of similarities between MT and sports, in terms of trying to pursue them at a college or professional level: In contrast to our involvement in MT, our family lived and breathed baseball from the time my son was 5 years old. The youth baseball world (same for soccer, tennis - you name it) is full of private camps, individual instruction, regional and national traveling teams, awards, recognitions, etc. As part of this process, your kid gets exposed to others on regional, national and even international levels. He quickly learns how he stacks up and, perhaps equally importantly, learns to push his game to a higher level. The kids end up getting training from increasingly experienced, skilled and well-connected instructors. The higher the level, the more brutally honest these instructors are, and the ballplayers and parents get increasingly realistic assessments of the chances of moving on to the next level. </p>
<p>In my son's case, he played on a top national traveling team, got a few looks from scouts, and is now playing baseball in college, but by his junior year in high school, we knew very well that his chances at playing at a top D-I school or being drafted were minimal, to the point where pursuing that blindly would have been an obvious mistake. Of course, it's true that there are some players whose talents and/or potential are apparent even without all of this extra training and evaluation, but the majority of the kids going on to play baseball in college and the pros have gone through the process my son has. </p>
<p>In hindsight, I can contrast his experience with my daughter's MT path. It would be as if my son had been limited to just playing on the local recreational and high school ball teams, receiving no instruction beyond what the high-school math teacher/baseball coach could provide. My D's situation wasn't that limited - she attended summer camps and has had some excellent outside instruction - but it's comparable. We knew early on that it didn't make sense for my son to expect to be drafted by the Yankees or try to walk on at U. of Texas, but we didn't have the same basis for knowledge regarding my D's MT chances. She loaded up on auditions at the most highly-competitive schools, but fortunately she also had several good but less competitive BFAs and some BAs on her list, so things look like they'll work out OK. But in hindsight we'd have been better off leaving some of the "top" schools off the list and instead including additional schools that don't have the same name recognition but that still have strong and valuable programs. </p>
<p>This is not meant to discourage anyone from reaching for the stars, but instead is just a caution to recognize some realities.</p>