<p>I added these up myself a while ago, based on the 1995 NRC rankings. Here's how I'd stack them up, based on how many top 10 programs a school has (I award 2 points for each program in this category) and how many programs ranked #11-#25 (1 point) in the 41 "core academic areas" listed by NRC:</p>
<p>rank/school/top 10 programs/#11-#25 programs/score</p>
<ol>
<li>Berkeley 35/1 71</li>
<li>Stanford 31/8 70</li>
<li>Harvard 25/4 54</li>
<li>Cornell 19/12 50</li>
<li>(tie) Michigan 14/21 49</li>
<li>(tie) UCLA 15/19 49</li>
<li>Princeton 21/6 48</li>
<li>Wisconsin 14/19 47</li>
<li>(tie) Chicago 16/12 44</li>
<li>(tie) Penn 14/16 44</li>
<li>Yale 18/7 43</li>
<li>MIT 20/2 42</li>
<li>Columbia 13/15 41</li>
<li>Texas 7/21 35</li>
<li>UIUC 10/13 33</li>
<li>Caltech 12/6 30</li>
<li>JHU 8/12 28</li>
<li>Minnesota 5/17 27</li>
<li>Duke 7/12 26</li>
<li>Northwestern 6/11 23</li>
<li>UNC Chapel Hill 3/16 22</li>
<li>Virginia 4/11 19</li>
<li>Brown 2/14 18 </li>
<li>NYU 2/13 17</li>
<li>WUSTL 3/8 14</li>
<li>Purdue 4/4 12</li>
</ol>
<p>Schools like Emory, Vanderbilt, and Georgetown scored 0/0. Notre Dame was 0/3, CMU 1/6, Rice 1/5, Georgia Tech 2/3.</p>
<p>Some caveats. First, I may have missed a few schools as I was generally working off the top national universities in the US News ranking, which obviously does not correlate particularly well with NRC rankings---but these would likely be schools that come out toward the lower end of these rankings. Second, this is old (1995) NRC data. Third, I was doing this late at night and may have missed or mistabulated some departmental rankings. Fourth, you might come out with a different ranking depending on where you draw the cutoffs and how you weight the categories; Princeton and MIT, for example, are arguably underrated in my ranking because they're effectively punished for not having the full range of programs that a Berkeley, Stanford, Michigan, or Wisconsin has, but what they do have is outstanding. (I didn't deduct points for missing programs, but with a limited number of programs it's hard to rack up points in my system even if the programs you do have are outstanding). </p>
<p>That said, I think this exercise is pretty revealing. Schools like Berkeley, Michigan, UCLA, Wisconsin, and, yes, Texas and UIUC have outstanding faculties---they're competitive with the very best private schools in the country, and rather stronger than all but a handful of top privates on this score. Some other schools that rarely get mentioned as academic leaders---Minnesota comes to mind---are clearly deserving of more respect than they typically get. I think these things are generally recognized in academia, but not so much in US News, and rarely on CC.</p>