<p>I'd put NYU above Wake, Emory, and Vandy. I'd also move G'town up, I'm not sure I'd even have Tufts in there. I'd also put Stanford above UPenn...don't pull a US News. Other than that, your ranking is pretty accurate.</p>
<p>"I'd put NYU above Wake, Emory, and Vandy."</p>
<p>You're kidding, right? I'm no fan of Wake or Vanderbilt, but NYU's only real strengths are business and math (and law, but that's graduate only of course), while the other three are decent in many areas. If it weren't for Stern, NYU would drop a good 15-20 spots on pretty much every undergrad college ranking.</p>
<p>still, the ranking is too generalized. You seriously need to be more specific. For example, in the humanities MIT and Caltech should the bottom two, while in engineering they should be top 2.</p>
<p>My honest opinion is that while Penn is an excellent school, Wharton is what gives them their extremely high ranking. The college of arts and sciences, I believe, is not as good HYP and Columbia (in the Ivies). </p>
<p>Just my opinion. These threads always create controversy and discussion. When you are up this high in the rankings, its just splitting hairs between schools and what any individual student is looking for.</p>
<p>in my opinion, this is an absolutely useless discussion. Even among the ivies, each has its own distinct qualities. A student who migh do extremely well at harvard might suffer at penn, and vice versa. Likewise, a student might do extremely well at UC santa cruz who would suffer at Columbia, but go on to a career as distinguished as any Columbia grad and/or get into the same grad schools.
Please, for the love of god, lets stop trying to quantify something. Comparing schools is way too often comparing apples to oranges.</p>