<p>Notre Dame used to be good at football, but now it is a bit of a joke. They haven’t won a national championship in either football or basketball in decades. UCLA is the same.</p>
<p>The state schools usually have the best sports programs, but their academics are questionable. Michigan and Cal are good at both sports and academics. </p>
<p>Boston College has an amazing hockey team, but its football and basketball programs aren’t as good as they were a couple years ago.</p>
<p>Duke is great at basketball and academically, but not football. UNC is probably better at football, but not as good academically. Obviously they are both great at basketball most years.</p>
<p>Stanford is good all around.</p>
<p>Vandy and Northwestern are bad at sports but great academically.</p>
<p>So it is tough. The best sports schools are not great academically (see UF; Ohio State).</p>
<p>UConn has one or two national championships in basketball in the past few decades, not anything to write home about. It also isn’t very good academically.</p>
<p>LOL everyone here is picking their schools.</p>
<p>
That’s isn’t considered the trifecta usually. Baseball and Lacrosse are just as popular as hockey depending on what part of the country you’re from.</p>
<p>Wisconsin is a good sports school but it has never won a football or basketball championship before. That slightly reduces its credibility as the best sports school.</p>
<p>^ except schools like Michigan and Texas have much stronger faculty and academic departments than schools like UVA, UNC, USC, and Notre Dame (per actual academic measures, not US News undergrad rankings) so they should be ranked above them considering sports are also very strong, if not stronger.</p>
<p>Strongly recommend just ignoring “Informative” and his posts and maybe he will go away. Much of what he spreads is disinformation. Ironic isn’t it?</p>
<p>Actually Wisconsin won an NCAA basketball title. And a pile of NCAA hockey titles. And several Rose Bowls and other bowls. Winning it all once is hardly a better record than competing at a high level every year. Nearly every school that wins a football NC has FAR more local talent to draw from–CA, TX, FL, Ohio. Lacrosse is much more a local sport than hockey which actually has a major pro league. College baseball is marginal but does have a pro league. But many of the best players skip college or are from overseas and are lucky to have completed high school.</p>
<p>When people consider sports, do they care about…</p>
<ol>
<li>only football and basketball?</li>
<li>only football, basketball, baseball, hockey, and lacrosse?</li>
<li>every sport (all around athletic excellence)</li>
</ol>
<p>If (1) is the criterion, then Florida would have to be the best school. If (2) is the criterion, then it’s a wash and one can choose between Texas (football and baseball), Duke (basketball and lacrosse), or Michigan (football and hockey). If (3) is the criterion, then it’s Stanford hands down.</p>
<p>florida is not top 20 academically not even top 50. good in academics and good in sports i think academic would have to be ranked top 25-30 range overall</p>