<p>My daughters have attended both parochial schools and independent schools. While I shouldn't say the differences are night and day, the differences are at least major:</p>
<p>(1) approach & content: The parochial schools targeted to the average, below average student unless the teacher was unusual. Certainly the curricula, which I had occasion to review thoroughly on the elem. level, noticeably addresed the average learner in terms of the skills expected to be learned. </p>
<p>(2) student body: with admissions a lot less selective, overall, than at the independents, there are fewer challenging peers for the capable student. Different students will react differently to this. My older one would become bored & depressed, while managing to excel in whatever way "allowed" by the school; the younger one would slack off, figuring out how to beat her closest competitor, & doing no more than that.</p>
<p>(3) quality of teachers: there were a handful of excellent ones; they were in the clear minority, & that perception was shared by everyone else we knew whose children attended similar schools. I do not attribute that entirely to salary differences, as some parochials try to remain competitive in that regard. I attribute that to the lack of imagination & challenge in the curriculum. A teacher myself, I do not choose to teach in such a school. The curriculum is often poorly designed, not age-appropriate, & not based on solid understanding of the advancing psychological & cognitive development of the child & adolescent.</p>
<p>(4) expectations in general, with a spillover effect on college admissions & the quality/orientation of the college counseling.</p>
<p>I found that once my daughters moved, the academic gaps in their parochial schools were rapidly filled by the independent schools. Good programs & better teachers will do this, not to mention better peer learners, as well. The lower half of their (newer) school has better college admissions results than the combined results of the senior class at the local parochials. </p>
<p>Qualifier to above: the Catholic schools which call themselves independent truly do operate that way, academically, are quite competitive for college admissions, have similar profiles & similar students. It's the ones that stay within diocesan restrictions, never seem to move forward, etc. that are noticeably different. I've also seen a decline in the last 6 yrs. among the latter, as the bar for the selective U.S. seems to get higher & higher. Previously the best parochial in the area would send 2-4 per year to Ivies or Stanford; that has not been true recently. This is what happens when it's more important to have an allegiance to a local authority than to look at the world around: the competition leaves you in the dust. I do not criticize the attention to values, & even a preference of that to academics. But then don't claim anything else; be honest that your mission is more about personal development/spiritual values & witness, than academics. (Just my little, or big, pet peeve.)</p>
<p>And as some other may have said, for one of my daughters, the better alternative would have been an excellent public school, for many reasons. She would have had the secular educational viewpoint with excellent peers & courses, but not with insane competition. For us it was not an option.</p>