Hey folks. I’m currently at Clarkson University for Civil Engineering and am considering transferring.
Let’s assume for the sake of this discussion that all finances are off the table.
I’m looking at the following schools: Cornell, WPI, RPI(accepted), UMASS Amherst(accepted), and Northeastern. The unspecified decisions have not come back yet; I am optimistic aside from Cornell.
The story is as follows: I was a so-so student in high school. Never really tried, did well in easy classes. I got into Clarkson and have attended it for the past year, doing extremely well-student government, multiple clubs, research. I have a better social life than I ever thought possible(definitely was not super popular in HS, now I have a solid friend group here). To top it off, academically speaking I’m doing phenomenally, I’ve gone from a 3.4 weighted in HS to a 3.923 here, on track for a 4.0 this semester.
The academic gap is what draws me to transferring. I’m doing better at Clarkson than I thought possible now that I’m working hard on my studies. The million dollar question is, is a more rigorous and stronger program better for me, or should I stay at Clarkson? While Clarkson has a strong Civil Engineering program, the schools on my list have a stronger program and all have better locations, campuses, climates, food(not a serious gripe but at Clarkson it’s reallllyyyyy bad), and I imagine more university funding.
Not to mention, is it worth it to give up what I have here? I’ve got friends, activities; both of which can be regained I suppose. But I also have a few job offers, a few research teams I can join, and Clarkson has an impeccable career center, only beaten(in schools on my list) by Northeastern.
What do people think is worth it? Do I take a chance on a stronger program, or stick with what’s tried, true, and working? Personally, I don’t see myself coming back next year. But I worry that it’ll be hard to get back what I’ve gotten here.
Thoughts? Thanks in advance folks.