<p>Does everyone know the difference between ucla bizecon vs usc business administration from Marshall?</p>
<p>the difference is that marshall is a top b-school whereas ucla’s econ+acct program is a fraud in order to attract business students that doesn’t understand the difference b/w econ and business</p>
<p><a href=“http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/uc-transfers/707315-ucla-vs-usc-business-econ-majors-haas-rejects.html[/url]”>http://talk.collegeconfidential.com/uc-transfers/707315-ucla-vs-usc-business-econ-majors-haas-rejects.html</a> </p>
<p>Try this link, it’s got some good information on the two school’s business programs. Both are legitimate schools, and neither has the need to commit fraud in order to attract business students. As far as I can tell the programs are similar with slightly different focuses. Don’t make your decision based on other peoples opinions though, the schools have such different personalities, you really should go visit both schools.</p>
<p>I tried to make that as unbiased as possible, but I was raised in a UCLA family so sorry if theres traces of anti-trojan in there. Are you trying to stay in LA? Because if not Haas, UC Berkeley’s school of business is great as well.</p>
<p>Usa! Usa!!</p>
<p>if you are poor, go to ucla. if you are rich go to usc.</p>
<p>One is Economics which require alot of math and is macro. </p>
<p>One is actually Business Admin where you learn how a business works in a micro perspective.</p>
<p>difference, if you get into marshall you’re in business
i think if you’re still transferring in you’re pre-business econ
also ucla’s transfer requirements for the major requires i think more math than does business at usc.</p>
<p>
The difference is that UCLA’s Anderson School of Business outranks Marshall and that many excellent Anderson professors (e.g. Paul Habibi) teach undergrad management courses. UCLA in general is more prestigious and cheaper. Plus the fact that multiple students land internships with the Big 4 and Bulge Bracket firms.</p>
<p>And yes, UCLA requires more math. But you know what? Solid quantitative skills are a necessity in the business/finance world. So yes you may have to work harder at UCLA than at USC, but at least you are getting more bang for your buck.</p>
<p><---- Yes I attend UCLA; feel free to draw whatever conclusions you like.</p>
<p>The fact that Anderson ranks higher than Marshall in MBA rankings bears no relevance when comparing undergraduate studies at UCLA/USC. There is, in fact, only one fact that bears any relevance at all-the fact that UCLA does not even have an undergrad business program. </p>
<p>So since you UCLA students tend to only look at rankings when comparing yourselves to USC (which soon will surpass UCLA in rankings by the end of this decade), understand the fact that USC is ranked #10 for its undergrad business program. And that UCLA is not ranked.</p>
<p>Employment should be fine at both schools. One just cost more than the other.</p>
<p>Curriculum is different. One you will study business and the other you will study econ. Just check out the curriculum for both. It is more than just more math. It is two different subjects. So choose what you want to study.</p>
<p>@ lakerforever24 “USC (which soon will surpass UCLA in rankings by the end of this decade)”</p>
<p>I thought USC’s school slogan was “Fight On!” not “Dream On!” Do yourself a favor and join in with all the UCI kids when rankings are being discussed. I think you’ll find you guys share a lot in common.</p>
<p>ps your bitterness and jealousy toward the obvious superiority of UCLA to SUC(k) is painfully evident.</p>
<p>hey if i follow igetc, and take micro and macro econ, and calc 1A, will that be sufficient to transfer to USC as a junior? OH and i took three years of foreign language spanish classes in high school, so that will that satisfy USC as well? Thanks</p>
<p>@joebin: marshall doesn’t have a foreign language requirement. you have to complete the writing requirement as well. if you are applying for fall 2011 or later, you can forget about micro/macro. USC will likely remove the econ courses as prereqs starting next yr (i spoke to the dean on transfer day). so the only thing u need is the writing requirement and calc. but since ur transfering as a junior, u should complete econ anyway, as well as the GE requirements and the financial/managerial acct courses</p>
<p>@cbbolts: and y exactly would i be “jealous and bitter” towards UCLA? i applied to both schools. is it b/c i, as a business major, prefer to go to a school that actually offers a degree in BA over a school that doesn’t? my “bitterness and jealousy” towards UCLA is as painfully evident as is your obvious rejection from berkeley</p>
<p>@ lakerforever24 hmm…let us break down your last comment: “my “bitterness and jealousy” towards UCLA is as painfully evident as is your obvious rejection from berkeley.” So what you must be saying is one of two things: either you are bitter and jealous of UCLA and it is as obvious as my rejection from Berkeley or you are rejecting that you are bitter and jealous of UCLA in which case it would not be obvious, and thus my rejection to Berkeley is not obvious?..well it appears that’s quite a choice for you, especially since I was not rejected by Berkeley, nice try though. In fact I would have rather attended UCSD (my hometown) than berk if LA rejected me (which they also didn’t). By the way I laugh at your feeble attempt to backtrack from your early statement, pretending as if you were merely expressing a “preference” for USC because it has a business major. Your comment that USC will surpass UCLA in ranking by the end of the decade remains ludicrous sir. Hope you take a couple logic courses once you transfer, possibly check out a few books on rhetoric as well…gosh where is anonymousername when you need him?</p>
<p>your inability to comprehend my statement supplements your 3.45 GPA @ CC perfectly. </p>
<p>and trust me, i have absolutely no reason to be bitter towards either school. both are great schools. and i am easily qualified to get accepted to both schools. and as a business major, i only have one option–USC. </p>
<p>UCLA is a great school. but its filled with pathetic students like you who think they’re better than everyone at USC b/c it’s ranked slightly lower. just b/c u got into UCLA into an easy major with ur low GPA u think ur better than USC students/applicants?</p>
<p>@ lakerforever24 - Out of curiosity, did you get accepted UCLA? (I’m assuming you got into USC) I noticed you said you applied to both, not that you were accepted to both.</p>
<p>decisions dont come out until april for UCs. USC comes out between april-june.</p>
<p>“your inability to comprehend my statement supplements your 3.45 GPA @ CC perfectly.”</p>
<p>Wow, that is ridiculous reasoning right thur. Lol</p>
<p>just as ridiculous as his reasoning that i have bitterness towards UCLA. i actually love UCLA. i just hate all the stupid kids that go there who think they’re automatically better than USC students, and that there’s no undergrad b program</p>
<p>oh, the way you were talking about the schools, I assumed you had already completed the admissions process (as in, applied for a previous term). I feel like your overly confident as to your qualifications to get into these schools. Plenty of 4.0 amazing students get rejected from these programs, so before you begin thinking that YOUR better then other people because you applied to USC maybe you should wait for that acceptance or rejection letter.</p>