<p>Okay, there is not a 70% chance of anyone getting in with 3.8 and above. You used blank logic. I never said anything about people getting in, I said that the majority of applicants admitted had a GPA in a certain range. So would it be beneficial to aim higher? YES obviously, but for struggling students (you know the ones with lower GPA’s) they can set a goal to be IN the group of students that were most accepted. Think of it this way, just because more people had GPAs in a certain range, this does not mean that they had a higher chance of getting in, it just means that more people got in with those GPA’s. Don’t make a claim that “less people had 3.8-4.0’s” when you have no data to back it up. How do you know the number of people with 4.0’s that applied? Can you show me? Why take the time to criticize something that I worked hours on to help struggling students, when you have no raw data to prove any argument? You can interpret this graph and the data any way you want, I just put it out there. </p>
<p>Secondly, yes a graph of rejected stats would help because you would get an idea of the GPA range that was least likely to get in. Let me collect enough data and do the calculations in SPSS (my trusty stats program)</p>