<p>I'm an in-state student. This means my parents' taxes have been used to pay for our state's public schools.</p>
<p>I'm a transfer student. This means I've spent two years attending a dull, lifeless community college in order to save my parents' money, hoping it would pay off for my last two years of college.</p>
<p>And now, with my junior year coming up this next fall, my mother is telling me that UC Santa Barbara is just too expensive. She insists that I attend UC Irvine so I can continue to live at home for two more years. In other words, I'll have graduated from college without ever having once gotten the chance to live in a dorm, not to mention getting an actual "college experience".</p>
<p>Am I the only one who isn't allowed to attend two years of a state college of my choice?</p>
<p>I mean, some kids get to attend expensive private schools straight out of high school, and I can't even attend a public school for two freakin' years.</p>
<p>I just can't help but read these threads on CC about high school kids and their parents deciding between private schools and LAC's that total $40k-$50k a year, for four years, and here I am not even able to enjoy a measly two years of UCSB.</p>
<p>I know that "life's not fair" and that there are "starving kids in Africa", but I can't help but get annoyed by this massive disparity between my college experience and those of my peers. Sure, it's petty, but hell, I haven't asked for anything else, and I don't even have a car or a cell phone. This is the <em>one</em> thing I'm asking for, and apparently, 19 years wasn't enough time for them to save up enough for two years of public school w/ dorm. -_-</p>
<p>I mean, the opportunity to get a "college experience" only happens once in a lifetime, and to have lived at home for all four of those years just seems like an awful waste of a valuable life experience.</p>