<p>So by this point, I've narrowed my college choices down to UNC Chapel Hill and William and Mary. (I've also been waitlisted at Cornell CALS, which I'll seriously consider if I end up getting taken off the waitlist.) There doesn't seem to be a huge amount of difference between them as far as academic reputation goes, but here's basically what's on my mind, in no particular order:</p>
<p>(BTW, I'm a white male from New York, who plans on majoring in econ. However, despite the funny similarities, I'm not the person who started the BC vs. UNC vs. W&M thread, elsewhere on this forum...)</p>
<p>1) UNC is generally considered to be a little superior to WM academcially, right? Which college (if either) is generally thought to have a better economics department?</p>
<p>2) In terms of the large number of students at UNC, how common is it to find yourself in a relatively large class (~50+ students)? Also, do the professors make themselves available enough to the students? And if anyone has experience with both schools, how much difference is there between UNC and W&M in this regard?</p>
<p>3) I'm moderately liberal, and I'm basically under the impression that W&M student body is overall somewhat conservative. That doesn't bother me that much (my family's conservative too... I'm pretty much used to it), but what are the general political leanings of the UNC student body? Obviously this isn't a make-it-or-break-it thing, just something that'd be nice.</p>
<p>4) Every now and then I've heard about budget problems at W&M. (Their endowment is $400m, vs. UNC's $2.3b, although UNC probably has higher expenses with their larger student body, and I don't know if they get additional money from the state also.) But is this a noticeable problem?</p>